Cited by 48Political Conflict and GovernancePolitical Science Research and EducationQualitative Comparative Analysis Research

Multiple Measurements, Elusive Agreement, and Unstable Outcomes in the Study of Regime Change

Open access
Lueders, Hans, Lust, Ellen·2017·SSRN Electronic Journal

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.3042470

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lueders, H., & Lust, E.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017
Volume
80
Issue
2
Pages
736-741
ISSN
  • 0022-3816 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-5068
OpenAlex
W2759504780
Cited by
48
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7
FWCI
9.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Politics (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Gothenburg University Publications Electronic Archive (Gothenburg University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • United States Agency for International Development
  • Institute of International Education
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Science Research and Education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
Keywords
regime change, measurement problem, conceptualization, elections, coups d'état, robustness of results, cumulative knowledge

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review