Cited by 20Ethics and Social Impacts of AIAI and HR TechnologiesNames, Identity, and Discrimination Research

Automating bias

Open access
Dutton, William H., Kraemer, Kenneth L.·1980·Society

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02700058

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Knowledge-based algorithmic decision-making systems may embody values and reproduce biases because the knowledge and modelling assumptions fed into them may reflect biases of system designers and data collection processes.

    “In the case of knowledge-based systems, the knowledge that is fed into the system, and assumptions that are involved in modelling it, may reflect biases of the system designers and data collection process”

    From Algorithmic Accountability and Public Reason (2018) · cites this paper as Dutton & Kraemer, 1980

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dutton, W. H., & Kraemer, K. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
Venue
Society
Published
1980-01
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
36-41
ISSN
  • 0041-1035 (ISSN-L)
  • 0147-2011
  • 1936-4725
OpenAlex
W3189885080
Cited by
20
References
4
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
15.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Society (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › AI and HR Technologies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
Keywords
automation, bias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review