The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measurement properties of skindex-16: A brief quality-of-life measure for patients with skin diseases
Abstract
BACKGROUND: An accurate, sensitive, but brief quality-of-life outcomes measure is needed for studies of dermatologic care. OBJECTIVE: To construct a single-page version of Skindex (a dermatologic quality-of-life instrument) that would have two new features compared with the current 29-item version: (1) fewer items to which a majority of patients choose the same response, and (2) measurement of bother rather than frequency of patient experiences. METHODS: Random samples of patients waiting for dermatology appointments in clinics of Veterans Affairs hospitals and in private dermatology practices completed questionnaires; 692 patients responded to the parent instrument and 541 additional patients responded to the brief version. Reproducibility, internal consistency reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the brief version of Skindex were determined. RESULTS: For 16 items of the current 29-item version (55%), more than 50% of patients responded "Never." After an explicit process of item analysis and elimination, a single-page 16-item version was composed that asks patients about bother from their experiences; responses are reported as three scales, Symptoms, Emotions, and Functioning. For 6 items of the 16-item version (38%), more than 50% of patients responded "Never." Scale scores were reproducible after 72 hours (r = 0.88-0.90) and were internally reliable (Cronbach's alpha = 0.86-0.93). The instrument demonstrated both content and construct validity: Most patients' responses to an open-ended question about their skin disease was addressed by the items; patients with inflammatory dermatoses had higher scores than those with isolated lesions; and in an exploratory principal axes factor analysis with an oblique rotation, 74% of the common variance was explained by three factors that correlated with the a priori scales. Mean scale scores stayed the same or changed in the expected direction in patients who reported that their skin was the same or had improved. CONCLUSION: This brief single-page version of Skindex accurately and sensitively measures how much patients are bothered by their skin conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A methodological framework for assessing health indices
Kirshner, B., & Guyatt, G. (1985) · Journal of Chronic Diseases · doi:10.1016/0021-9681(85)90005-0 · Cited by 1,538
Chren, M.-M., Lasek, R. J., Quinn, L. M., Mostow, E. N., & Zyzanski, S. J. (1996) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1111/1523-1747.ep12365600 · Cited by 699
Self-citationThe Problem of Quality of Life in Medicine
Leplège, A. (1997) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1997.03550010061041 · Cited by 640
Measuring health status: What are the necessary measurement properties?
Guyatt, G. H., Kirshner, B., & Jaeschke, R. (1992) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/0895-4356(92)90194-r · Cited by 530
Chren, M.-M. (1997) · Archives of Dermatology · doi:10.1001/archderm.1997.03890470111018 · Cited by 480
Self-citationChren, M. (1997) · Archives of Dermatology · doi:10.1001/archderm.133.11.1433 · Cited by 446
Self-citationClinical impact versus factor analysis for quality of life questionnaire construction
Juniper, E. F., Guyatt, G. H., Streiner, D. L., & King, D. R. (1997) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(96)00377-0 · Cited by 325
Peters, T. J., Donovan, J. L., Kay, H. E., Abrams, P., de la Rosette, J. J. M. C. H., Porru, D., & Thuroff, J. W. (1997) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(01)65075-4 · Cited by 313
Acne Vulgaris and the Quality of Life of Adult Dermatology Patients
Lasek, R. J., & Chren, M.-M. (1998) · Archives of Dermatology · doi:10.1001/archderm.134.4.454 · Cited by 285
Self-citationChren, M., Lasek, R. J., Quinn, L., & Covinsky, K. E. (1997) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1111/1523-1747.ep12285650 · Cited by 123
Self-citation
Cited by
Olsen, E. A., Whittaker, S., Kim, Y. H., Duvic, M., Prince, H. M., Lessin, S. R., Wood, G. S., Willemze, R., Demierre, M.-F., Pimpinelli, N., et al. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2010.32.0630 · Cited by 666
The Skindex Instruments to Measure the Effects of Skin Disease on Quality of Life
Chren, M.-M. (2012) · Dermatologic Clinics · doi:10.1016/j.det.2011.11.003 · Cited by 304
Self-citationDevelopment and validation of a health-related quality of life instrument for women with melasma
Balkrishnan, R., Mcmichael, A. J., Camacho, F. T., Saltzberg, F., Housman, T. S., Grummer, S., Feldman, S. R., & Chren, M.-M. (2003) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2133.2003.05419.x · Cited by 290
Self-citationNakagawa, H., Nemoto, O., Igarashi, A., Saeki, H., Kaino, H., & Nagata, T. (2020) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2019.12.015 · Cited by 242
Teledermatology research review
Whited, J. D. (2006) · International Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-4632.2004.02427.x · Cited by 186
Metadata
- Authors
- Chren, M.-M., Lasek, R. J., Sahay, A. P., & Sands, L. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-03
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 105-110
- ISSN
- 1203-4754 (ISSN-L)
- 1615-7109
- OpenAlex
- W2073746524
- Cited by
- 450
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 4.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measurement properties of skindex-16: A brief quality-of-life measure for patients with skin diseases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf02737863
- The paper
- Chren, M.-M., Lasek, R. J., Sahay, A. P., & Sands, L. P. (2001). Measurement properties of skindex-16: A brief quality-of-life measure for patients with skin diseases. Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02737863
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.