Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 450

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Measurement properties of skindex-16: A brief quality-of-life measure for patients with skin diseases

Chren, Mary-Margaret, Lasek, Rebecca J., Sahay, Anju P., Sands, Laura P.·2001·Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An accurate, sensitive, but brief quality-of-life outcomes measure is needed for studies of dermatologic care. OBJECTIVE: To construct a single-page version of Skindex (a dermatologic quality-of-life instrument) that would have two new features compared with the current 29-item version: (1) fewer items to which a majority of patients choose the same response, and (2) measurement of bother rather than frequency of patient experiences. METHODS: Random samples of patients waiting for dermatology appointments in clinics of Veterans Affairs hospitals and in private dermatology practices completed questionnaires; 692 patients responded to the parent instrument and 541 additional patients responded to the brief version. Reproducibility, internal consistency reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the brief version of Skindex were determined. RESULTS: For 16 items of the current 29-item version (55%), more than 50% of patients responded "Never." After an explicit process of item analysis and elimination, a single-page 16-item version was composed that asks patients about bother from their experiences; responses are reported as three scales, Symptoms, Emotions, and Functioning. For 6 items of the 16-item version (38%), more than 50% of patients responded "Never." Scale scores were reproducible after 72 hours (r = 0.88-0.90) and were internally reliable (Cronbach's alpha = 0.86-0.93). The instrument demonstrated both content and construct validity: Most patients' responses to an open-ended question about their skin disease was addressed by the items; patients with inflammatory dermatoses had higher scores than those with isolated lesions; and in an exploratory principal axes factor analysis with an oblique rotation, 74% of the common variance was explained by three factors that correlated with the a priori scales. Mean scale scores stayed the same or changed in the expected direction in patients who reported that their skin was the same or had improved. CONCLUSION: This brief single-page version of Skindex accurately and sensitively measures how much patients are bothered by their skin conditions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02737863

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Chren, M.-M., Lasek, R. J., Sahay, A. P., & Sands, L. P.
Venue
Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery
Published
2001-03
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
105-110
ISSN
  • 1203-4754 (ISSN-L)
  • 1615-7109
OpenAlex
W2073746524
Cited by
450
References
10
FWCI
4.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.