Toward a comparative evaluation of human impacts on fishery ecosystems of enclosed and semi‐enclosed seas
Abstract
Fisheries of enclosed and semi‐enclosed seas provide the first basis for evaluating human impacts on marine ecosystems. These have become of serious concern before similar changes are detectable in oceanic systems, thus emphasizing their value as laboratories for comparative study of man‐induced changes. The paper discusses the relevance of the cline, oligo‐meso‐eu‐dys‐trophic to stressed marine systems, and focuses on impacts on fisheries of enhanced nutrient runoff, noting common features with marine systems subject to natural enrichment, but also with well‐studied freshwater systems. It is suggested that under nutrient enrichment and heavy fishing, both “top down”; and “bottom up”; trophic mechanisms act in synchrony to change the trophic chain, leading initially to increased fishery productivity of formerly oligotrophic systems, followed by more drastic and negative changes as nutrient input passes beyond a state that may be called mesotrophic. Nutrient enrichment and overfishing have similar and synergistic effects: a decline in diversity, an initial increase in productivity of benthic/demersal and pelagic food webs, then the progressive dominance of the production system by short‐lived, especially pelagic, species. The separation of these two anthropogenic effects on semi‐enclosed seas is difficult and has been confounded by the synchronous growth of industrial fishing, and of downstream impacts of growing populations, industrialization and agro‐industry, and growing water usage, especially since World War II. A description of human impacts on several semi‐enclosed seas emphasizes the Marine Catchment Basin (MCB) concept, noting that ranking by the relative extents of catchment area and marine basin explains much of the observed impact. A systems approach to management of inland and coastal seas is suggested, with priority on the control of nutrient flows between terrestrial and aquatic systems, and the establishment of accurate statistical systems integrating fisheries and environmental data over whole basins and coastal seas.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Such changes in fish distributions can occur at large scales as a consequence of environmental climate drivers, or they could result from local factors such as habitat quality and prey availability.
“Such changes in fish distributions can occur at large scales as a consequence of environmental climate drivers (Nye et al. 2009, Pinsky & Fogarty 2012), or they could result from local factors such as habitat quality and prey availability (e.g.Caddy 1993, Craig 2012).”
From Patterns and drivers of the demersal fish community of Chesapeake Bay (2013) · cites this paper as Caddy 1993
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Eutrophication of Chesapeake Bay: historical trends and ecological interactions.
Kemp, W., Boynton, W., Adolf, J., Boesch, D., Boicourt, W., Brush, G., Cornwell, J., Fisher, T., Glibert, P., Hagy, J., et al. (2005) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps303001 · Cited by 1,468 · see citing works
Challenges and opportunities for science in reducing nutrient over-enrichment of coastal ecosystems
Boesch, D. F. (2002) · Estuaries · doi:10.1007/bf02804914 · Cited by 381 · see citing works
Caddy, J. F., & Cochrane, K. L. (2001) · Ocean & Coastal Management · doi:10.1016/s0964-5691(01)00074-6 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Self-citationJung, S., & Houde, E. D. (2003) · Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science · doi:10.1016/s0272-7714(03)00085-4 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Patterns and drivers of the demersal fish community of Chesapeake Bay
Buchheister, A., Bonzek, C., Gartland, J., & Latour, R. (2013) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps10253 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
- Authors
- Caddy, J. F.
- Affiliations
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Caddy, J. F.
- Venue
- Reviews in Fisheries Science
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1993-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 57-95
- ISSN
- 1064-1262 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-6553
- OpenAlex
- W2031814643
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 3.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Reviews in Fisheries Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal ecosystems
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Coastal and Marine Management
- Keywords
- human impacts on marine ecosystems, enclosed seas, semi-enclosed seas, fisheries, nutrient enrichment, overfishing, trophic cascades, trophic levels, trophic chain, nutrient runoff, coastal fisheries management, biodiversity loss
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review