The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The domestication ofcucurbita (Cucurbitaceae)
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The co-occurrence of the squash phytolith with maize in the same sample is significant because it provides indirect evidence for early manipulation of squash in a region where the original domestication of c. moschata may have taken place.
“However, wild or domesticated, the co-occurrence of this squash phytolith with maize in the same sample is significant because it provides indirect evidence for early manipulation of squash in a region where the original domestication of c. moschata may have taken place (Nee 1990;Piperno and Pearsall 1998;Sanjur et al. 2002).”
From Human occupation and the environment during the holocene in the river cauca valley, colombia: the evidence from paleobotany and from soil studies (2013) · cites this paper as Nee 1990
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 33
- Andres, T.1987.Cucurbita fraterna, the closest wild relative and progenitor ofC. pepo. Cucurbit Genetics Cooperative Report10:69–71.
- —. 1990. Biosystematics, theories on the origin, and breeding potential ofCucurbita ficifolia. Pages 102–119in D. M. Bates, R. W. Robinson, and C. Jeffrey, eds., Biology and utilization of the Cucurbitaceae. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
- —, and G. P. Nabhan. 1988. Taxonomic rank and rarity ofCucurbita okeechobeensis. Cucurbit Genetics Cooperative Report11:83–85.
- Bailey, L. H. 1929. The domesticated Cucurbitas. I. Gentes Herb. 2:62–115.
- —. 1943. Species ofCucurbita. Gentes Herb.6:267–322.
- —. 1948. Jottings in the Cucurbitas. Gentes Herb. 7:449–477.
- Cárdenas, M. 1969. Manual de las plantas económicas de Bolivia. Imprenta Icthus, Cochabamba, Bolivia.
- Cutler, H. C., and T. W. Whitaker. 1956.Cucurbita mixta Pang., its classification and relationships. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club83:253–260. · DOI
- —, and—. 1961. History and distribution of the cultivated cucurbits in the Americas. Amer. Antiquity26:469–185. · DOI
- D’Arcy, W. G., and W. H. Eshbaugh. 1974. New World peppers (Capsicum—Solanaceae) north of Colombia: a résumé. Baileya19:93–105.
- Decker, D. 1988. Origin(s), evolution, and systematics ofCucurbita pepo (Cucurbitaceae). Econ. Bot.42:4–15. · DOI
- Decker-Walters, D. 1990. Evidence of multiple domestications ofCucurbita pepo. Pages 96–101in D. M. Bates, R. W. Robinson, and C. Jeffrey, eds., Biology and utilization of the Cucurbitaceae. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
- DeVaux, J. S., and E. B. Schultz. 1985. Development of the buffalo gourd (Cucurbita foetidissima) as a semiaridland starch and oil crop. Econ. Bot.39:454–472. · DOI
- Eshbaugh, W. H. 1975. Genetic and biochemical systematic studies of chili peppers (Capsicum-Solanaceae). Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 102:396–103. · DOI
- Hawkes, J. G., and J. P. Hjerting. 1989. The potatoes of Bolivia: their breeding value and evolutionary relationships. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
- Heiser, C. B., Jr. 1985. Some botanical considerations of the early domesticated plants north of Mexico. Pages 57–72in R. I. Ford, ed., Prehistoric food production in North America. Anthrop. Paper 75, Museum of Anthropology, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
- Hurd, P. D., Jr., and E. G. Linsley. 1964. The squash and gourd bees—generaPeponapis Robertson andXenoglossa Smith—inhabiting America north of Mexico (Hymenoptera: Apoidea). Hilgardia35:375–177. · DOI
- —, and—. 1966. The Mexican squash and gourd bees of the genusPeponapis (Hymenoptera: Apoidea). Ann. Entom. Soc. Amer.59:835–851. · DOI
- —, and —. 1967. South American squash and gourd bees of the genusPeponapis (Hymenoptera: Apoidea). Ann. Entom. Soc. Amer.60:647–661. · DOI
- Jeffrey, C. 1978. Further notes on Cucurbitaceae: IV. Some New World taxa. Kew Bull.33:347–380. · DOI
- —. 1990. Appendix: an outline classification of the Cucurbitaceae. Pages 449–463in D. M. Bates, R. W. Robinson, and C. Jeffrey, eds., Biology and utilization of the Cucurbitaceae. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
- Kirkpatrick, K. J., and H. D. Wilson. 1988. Interspecific gene flow inCucurbita: C. texana vs.C. pepo. Amer. J. Bot.75:519–527. · DOI
- Mabberley, D. J. 1985. “Die neuen Pflanzen von Ch. Huber Freres & Co. in Hyeres.” Taxon34: 448–456. · DOI
- Merrick, L. C. 1990. Systematics and evolution of a domesticated squash,Cucurbita argyrosperma, and its wild and weedy relatives. Pages 77–95in D. M. Bates, R. W. Robinson, and C. Jeffrey, eds., Biology and utilization of the Cucurbitaceae. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
- —, and D. M. Bates. 1989. Classification and nomenclature ofCucurbita argyrosperma Huber. Baileya23:94–102.
- Millán, R. 1945. Variaciones del zapallito amargoCucurbita andreana y el origen deCucurbita maxima. Revista Argent. Agron.12:86–93.
- Naudin, C. 1856. Nouvelles recherches sur les caractères spécifiques et les variétés des plantes du genreCucurbita. Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot., Ser. 4, 6:5–72.
- Nee, M. In press. Cucurbitaceae.In Flora de Veracruz. INIREB, Xalapa, Mexico.
- Puchalski, J. T., and R. W. Robinson. 1990. Electrophoretic analysis of isozymes inCucurbita andCucumis and its application for phylogenetic studies. Pages 60–76in D. M. Bates, R. W. Robinson, and C. Jeffrey, eds., Biology and utilization of the Cucurbitaceae. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
- Whitaker, T. W. 1980. Cucurbitáceas americanas útiles al hombre. CIC: Provinica de Buenos Aires, Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas, Buenos Aires.
- —. 1981. Archeological cucurbits. Econ. Bot.35:460–466. · DOI
- —, and W. P. Bemis. 1975. Origin and evolution of the cultivatedCucurbita. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 102:362–368. · DOI
- Zhiteneva, N. E. 1929–1930. The world’s assortment of pumpkins. Trudy Prikl. Bot.23:157–207.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Preceramic Adoption of Peanut, Squash, and Cotton in Northern Peru
Dillehay, T. D., Rossen, J., Andres, T. C., & Williams, D. E. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1141395 · Cited by 273
Terminal pleistocene/early holocene human adaptation in coastal ecuador: the las vegas evidence
Stothert, K. E., Piperno, D. R., & Andres, T. C. (2003) · Quaternary International · doi:10.1016/s1040-6182(02)00200-8 · Cited by 75
Duncan, N., Cardale Schrimpjf, M., Groot, A. M., Botero, P., Betancourt, A., & Berrio, J. C. (2013) · Diálogo andino · doi:10.4067/s0719-26812013000100010 · Cited by 3
New evidence of early holocene agriculture from the coast of Ecuador: a multidisciplinary approach
Stothert, K. E., Piperno, D. R., & Andres, T. C. (2002) · Culture & Agriculture · doi:10.1525/cag.2002.24.2.31 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Nee, M.
- Venue
- Economic Botany
- Published
- 1990-07
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- S3
- Pages
- 56-68
- ISSN
- 0013-0001
- 1874-9364
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
