Cited by 3Archaeology and ancient environmental studiesAmazonian Archaeology and EthnohistoryMaritime and Coastal Archaeology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

New Evidence of Early Holocene Agriculture from the Coast of Ecuador: A Multidisciplinary Approach

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1525/cag.2002.24.2.31

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Andres T. C., 2002, Cucurtitacea 2002, 95
  2. Byrd Kathleen M.1976Changing Animal Utilization Patterns and Their Implications: Southwest Ecuador (6500 BC to AD 1400). Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Florida.
  3. Chase Thomas, 1988, La Prehistoria Temprana de la Península de Santa Elena, Ecuador: La Cultura Las Vegas, 171
  4. Fritz G. J., 1994, Reply (to Piperno), Current Anthropology, 35, 639
  5. Lindao Quimí Roberto, 1994, El Uso Vernáculo de los Arboles y Plantas en la Peninsula de Santa Elena
  6. Malpass Michael, 1992, Preceramic Houses and Household Organization along the Western Coast of South America, Andean Past, 3, 137
  7. Pearsall Deborah M., 1988, La Producción de Alimentos en Real Alto: La Aplicación de las Técicas Etnobotánicas al Problema de la Subsistencia en el Período Formativo Ecuatoriano
  8. Piperno Dolores R., 1988, Miscelánea, Antropológica Ecuatoriana, Serie Monográfica 10, 203
  9. Piperno Dolores R., 1989, Foraging and Farming: The Evolution of Plant Domestication, 538
  10. Rossen Jack1991Ecotones and Low‐Risk Intensification: The Middle Preceramic Occupation of Nanchoc Northern Peru. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Kentucky.
  11. Stothert Karen E., 1988, La Prehistoria Temprana de la Peninsula de Santa Elena, Ecuador: La Cultura Las Vegas (with contributions by T. Chase, D. Piperno, E. Wing, and D. Ubelaker). Miscelánea Antropológica Ecuatoriana, Serie Monográfica 10
  12. Stothert Karen E. Dolores R. Piperno andThomasAndres.1998An Early Holocene Maritime Adaptation in Coastal Ecuador: The Las Vegas Evidence. Paper presented in the Symposium on Terminal Pleistocene/Early Holocene Maritime Adaptions along the Pacific Coast of the Americas Society for American Archaeology Seattle WA.
  13. Ubelaker Douglas H., 1980, Human Skeletal Remains from Site OGSE‐80, A Preceramic Site on the Santa Elena Peninsula, Coastal Ecuador, Journal of the Washington Academy of Science, 70, 3
  14. Ubelaker Douglas H., 1988, La Prehistoria Temprana de la Peninsula de Santa Elena, Ecuador: La Cultura Las Vegas, 105
  15. Valverde Flor de María, 1979, Cubierta Vegetal de la Península de Santa Elena
  16. Wolf Teodoro, 1975, Geografia y Geología del Ecuador

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Stothert, K. E., Piperno, D. R., & Andres, T. C.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio (US)
  • Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (PA)
Venue
Culture & Agriculture
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-09
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
31-41
ISSN
  • 1048-4876 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-486X
OpenAlex
W2055558428
Cited by
3
References
27
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Culture & Agriculture (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Andrew W. Mellon Foundation
  • Vedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAV
  • Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Archeology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Maritime and Coastal Archaeology
Keywords
Early Holocene, ancient agriculture, Ecuadorian coast, prehistoric agriculture, crop domestication, archaeobotany, coastal archaeology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review