Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 327

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The dynamics of crop infraspecific diversity: A conceptual framework at the farmer level 1

Bellon, Mauricio R.·1996·Economic Botany
DOI 10.1007/bf02862110
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02862110

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Bennett, J. W. 1976. Anticipation, adaptation, and the concept of culture in anthropology. Science 192:847–853. · doi:10.1126/science.192.4242.847
  2. Berlin, B., D. E. Breedlove, andR. H. Raven. 1974. Principles of Tzeltal plant classification: an introduction to botanical ethnography of a Mayanspeaking community in highland Chiapas. Academic Press, New York.
  3. Brush, S. B. 1980. Estrategias agricolas tradicionales en las zonas montanosas de América Latina. Pages 65–76in A. R. Novoa and J. L. Posner, eds., Agricultura de ladera en América Tropical. Turrialba, CATIE, Costa Rica.
  4. CEPAL (Comisión Económica para América Latina). 1982. Economía campesina y agriculture empresarial. Siglo Veintiuno Editores, México, D.E
  5. CGIAR (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research). 1994. Partners in selection: bean breeders and women bean experts in Rwanda. Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research, Washington, DC.
  6. Dennis, J. V. 1987. Farmer management of rice variety diversity in northern Thailand. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, Cornell University. Michigan. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.
  7. Glass, E. H., andH. D. Thurston. 1978. Traditional and modern crop protection in perspective. Bioscience 28:109–115. · doi:10.2307/1307424
  8. IPGRI (International Plant Genetic Resources Institute). 1993. Diversity for development: the strategy of the International Plant Genetic Resources Institute. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome.
  9. Lambert, D. H. 1985. Swamp rice farming: the indigenous Pahang Malay agricultural system. Westview Press,Boulder.
  10. Louette, D. 1994. Gestion traditionnelle de variétés de maïs dans la Réserve de la Biosphère Sierra de Manatlan (RBSM, états de Jalisco et Colima, Mexique) et conservationin situ des ressources génétiques de plantes cultivées. Thèse de Doctorat, Ecole Nationale Supérieure Agronomique de Montpellier, France.
  11. Mapes, C. 1987. El maíz entre los Purépechas de la cuenca del lago de Pátzcuaro, Michoacán, México. América Indígena 47:345–379.
  12. Montanez, C., andA. Warman. 1985. Los productores de maíz en México: restricciones y alternativas. Centro de Ecodesarrollo, México, D.F.
  13. Museo Nacional de Culturas Populares. 1982. El maíz: fundamento de la cultura popular mexicana. Secretaría de Educación Pública, México, D.F.
  14. NRC (National Research Council). 1993. Managing global genetic resources: agricultural crop issues and policies. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
  15. Perales, H. R. 1992. El autoconsumo en la agriculture de los Popolucas de Soteapan, Veracruz. Tesís de Maestría, Colegio de Postgraduados, Montecillos, Edo. de México.
  16. Poats, S. V.,M. Schmink, andA. Spring, eds. 1988. Gender issues in farming systems research and extension. Westview Press, Boulder.
  17. Roumasset, J. 1976. Rice and risk. North-Holland Press, Amsterdam.
  18. Sperling, L., andM. E. Loevinsohn. 1993. The dynamics of adoption: distribution and mortality of bean varieties among small farmers in Rwanda. Agricultural Systems 41:441–53. · doi:10.1016/0308-521x(93)90044-3
  19. —, —, andB. Ntabomvura. 1993. Rethinking the fanner’s role in plant breeding: local bean experts and on-station selection in Rwanda. Experimental Agriculture 29:509–519. · doi:10.1017/s0014479700021219
  20. Stark, O. 1982. Research on rural-to-urban migration in LDC’s: the confusion frontier and why we should pause to rethink afresh. World Development 10:63–70. · doi:10.1016/0305-750x(82)90080-8
  21. Sutlive, V. H. 1978. The Iban of Sarawak. AHM Publishing Co, Arlington Heights, VA.
  22. Williams, J. T. 1988. Identifying and protecting the origins of our plants. Pages 240–247in E. O. Wilson, ed., Biodiversity. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.
  23. Zimmerer, K. S., andD. S. Douches. 1991. Geographical approaches to native crop research and conservation: the partitioning of allelic diversity in Andean potatoes. Economic Botany 45:176–189. · doi:10.1007/bf02862046

Cited by

See all 327

Metadata

Authors
Bellon, M. R.
Venue
Economic Botany
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
1996-01
Volume
50
Issue
1
Pages
26-39
ISSN
  • 0013-0001 (ISSN-L)
  • 1874-9364
DOI
10.1007/bf02862110
OpenAlex
W7750726
Cited by
327
References
41
FWCI
59.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.