Cited by 38Eating Disorders and BehaviorsPerfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Multidimensional self reports as a measure of characteristics in people with eating disorders.

Davies, H., Liao, P.-C., Campbell, I.C., Tchanturia, K.·2009·Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia Bulimia and Obesity

Abstract

This study used multidimensional self report assessments to measure perfectionism, impulsivity and obsessive compulsive characteristics in females with anorexia nervosa (AN), bulimia nervosa (BN) and in matched healthy controls (HC). The Frost Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (FMPS), Barrett Impulsivity Scale (BIS) and Obsessive Compulsive Inventory-Revised (OCI-R) scale were completed by 107 participants (AN=30, BN=26, HC=51), in parallel with clinical measures. Results show that people with AN have the highest scores on the dimensions of the FMPS as well as on the overall score; the AN and BN groups have the highest scores on the dimensions and on the overall score of the OCI-R; on the BIS, the AN and BN groups have the highest scores on the attention subscale, but there are no group differences on the overall BIS scores. In relation to the FMPS, the global score, and the subscales 'concern over mistakes' and 'doubts about actions' are all highly correlated with both eating pathology (Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire, EDE-Q) and low global functioning (Structured Clinical Interview for DSM IV, SCID). The subscale 'obsessing' on the OCI-R shows a strong correlation with eating pathology. The overall score and also the subscales of the BIS do not show strong correlations with eating pathology or poor global functioning. In conclusion, therapies should seek to address these specific areas which are highly correlated with eating disorder pathology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf03327804

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davies, H., Liao, P.-C., Campbell, I. C., & Tchanturia, K.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Davies, H.
Venue
Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia Bulimia and Obesity
Published
2009-06
Volume
14
Issue
2-3
Pages
e84-e91
ISSN
  • 1124-4909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1590-1262
OpenAlex
W2017095344
Cited by
38
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia Bulimia and Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (RP-PG-0606-1043)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, eating disorders, perfectionism, impulsivity, Frost Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale, Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised, eating pathology, global functioning, women
MeSH terms
Adult, Anorexia Nervosa, Compulsive Behavior, Female, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, London, Obsessive Behavior, Personality, Personality Tests, Multivariate Analysis, Case-Control Studies, Bulimia Nervosa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review