CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 18Historical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesArchaeology and Cultural HeritageCultural Heritage Management and Preservation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An Engaged Archaeology for Our Mutual Benefit: The Case of New Philadelphia

Agbe-Davies, Anna S.·2010·Historical Archaeology
DOI 10.1007/bf03376778
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The availability of the new generation of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapies for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has completely transformed the HCV therapeutic landscape. Current regimens provide pan-genotypic coverage that are of short duration, safer, and are highly effective than prior generations of HCV therapeutics. While data from clinical trials and real-world experience continue to demonstrate similar and high sustained virologic response (SVR) rates, the successful implementation of the HCV cascade-of-care including screening, confirmation of active infection, treatment initiation and successful completion of therapy among more challenging populations, such as the underserved populations who are also disproportionally affected by HCV, remains vital to HCV eradication efforts.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf03376778

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This perspective takes the discipline beyond its role as contributor of specialized information about 'the community's' past, and positions practitioners in a relationship that is more mutually beneficial and has less to do with mining a community for information, or dispensing research findings as a charitable act.

    “This perspective takes the discipline beyond its role as contributor of specialized information about ''the community's'' past (or ''a community [in the past]''), and positions practitioners in a relationship that is more mutually beneficial and has less to do with mining a community for information, or dispensing research findings as a charitable act (Little 2007:7-9; Agbe-Davies 2010b).”

    From Inside/Outside, Upside Down: Including Archaeologists in Communities (2011) · cites this paper as Agbe-Davies 2010b

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. 2002 Archaeology of the Old Elliot School. Bermuda Journal of Archaeology and Maritime History 13:129–154.
  2. 2008 Public Archaeology and the Continuing Legacy of Uplift and Female Empowerment at the Phyllis Wheatley Home for Girls, Chicago. Paper presented at the 14th Annual Berkshire Conference on the History of Women, Minneapolis, MN.
  3. Agbe-Davies, Anna S. [2008] Community Archaeology in Bronzeville: The Phyllis Wheatley Home for Girls. Ohio Valley Historical Archaeology 23:23–29.
  4. Demel, Scott J., and Chapurukha M. Kusimba 2007 Reconstructing Heritage in Central Illinois. The Field Museum, Chicago, IL < http://www.fieldmuseum.org /expeditions/chap_expedition/about.html>.
  5. Edwards, Ywone D. 1994 Beyond “Africanisms”: Recent Approaches to African-American Archaeology. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association of African-American Studies, Petersburg, VA.
  6. Fennell, Christopher C. (organizer) 2007 Research Designs for Atlantic Africa and African Diaspora Archaeologies. Forum held at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Historical Archaeology Conference on Historical and Underwater Archaeology, Williamsburg, VA.
  7. McDavid, Carol 2004 From “Traditional” Archaeology to Public Archaeology to Community Action. In Places in Mind: Public Archaeology as Applied Anthropology, Paul A. Shackel and Erve Chambers, editors, pp. 35–56. Routledge, New York, NY.
  8. Nassaney, Michael, and Mary Ann Levine (organizers) 2007 Archaeological Practice and Community Service Learning. Symposium held at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Historical Archaeology Conference on Historical and Underwater Archaeology, Williamsburg, VA.
  9. Weber, Max 1978 Ethnic Groups. In Economy and Society, Vol. 1, pp. 385–398. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Agbe-Davies, A. S.
Venue
Historical Archaeology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2010-03
Volume
44
Issue
1
Pages
1-6
ISSN
  • 0440-9213 (ISSN-L)
  • 2328-1103
DOI
10.1007/bf03376778
OpenAlex
W2537816679
Semantic Scholar
a39823681030815e5fbd335743ff63a52fcb9ffd
Cited by
18
References
23
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Historical Archaeology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Archaeology and Cultural Heritage
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
Keywords
New Philadelphia, community archaeology, African American history, historic preservation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review