Cited by 9Historical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesRace, History, and American SocietyRace, Genetics, and Society

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Dealing with “Race” in African American Archaeology

Agbe‐Davies, Anna·1998·Anthropology News

Abstract

Risk prediction models are used to determine eligibility for targeted lung cancer screening. However, prospective data regarding model performance in this setting are limited. Here we report the performance of the PLCOm2012 risk model, which calculates 6 year lung cancer risk, in a cohort invited for lung cancer screening in a socioeconomically deprived area.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/an.1998.39.5.14

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Agbe‐Davies, A.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Agbe‐Davies, Anna
Venue
Anthropology News
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-05
Volume
39
Issue
5
Pages
14-14
ISSN
  • 0098-1605 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-6151
  • 1556-3502
OpenAlex
W2164857743
Cited by
7
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Anthropology News (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Race, Genetics, and Society
Keywords
race, African American archaeology, racial identity, race relations, African American history

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review