The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A canonical purification for the entanglement wedge cross-section
Open accessAbstract
In AdS/CFT we consider a class of bulk geometric quantities inside the entanglement wedge called reflected minimal surfaces. The areas of these surfaces are dual to the entanglement entropy associated to a canonical purification (the GNS state) that we dub the reflected entropy. From the bulk point of view, we show that half the area of the reflected minimal surface gives a reinterpretation of the notion of the entanglement wedge cross-section. We prove some general properties of the reflected entropy and introduce a novel replica trick in CFTs for studying it. The duality is established using a recently introduced approach to holographic modular flow. We also consider an explicit holographic construction of the canonical purification, introduced by Engelhardt and Wall; the reflected minimal surfaces are simply RT surfaces in this new spacetime. We contrast our results with the entanglement of purification conjecture, and finally comment on the continuum limit where we find a relation to the split property: the reflected entropy computes the von Neumann entropy of a canonical splitting type-I factor introduced by Doplicher and Longo.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ryu, S., & Takayanagi, T. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.181602 · Cited by 4,302
Entanglement Entropy and Quantum Field Theory
Calabrese, P., & Cardy, J. (2004) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.hep-th/0405152 · Cited by 3,275
Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory
Calabrese, P., & Cardy, J. (2004) · Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment · doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2004/06/p06002 · Cited by 3,275
Haag, R. (1996) · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-61458-3 · Cited by 2,443
A covariant holographic entanglement entropy proposal
Hubeny, V. E., Rangamani, M., & Takayanagi, T. (2007) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/07/062 · Cited by 1,822
A Covariant Holographic Entanglement Entropy Proposal
Hubeny, V. E., Rangamani, M., & Takayanagi, T. (2007) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.0705.0016 · Cited by 1,822
Geometric and renormalized entropy in conformal field theory
Holzhey, C., Larsen, F., & Wilczek, F. (1994) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(94)90402-2 · Cited by 1,769
Eternal black holes in anti-de Sitter
Maldacena, J. (2003) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2003/04/021 · Cited by 1,555
Black holes and the butterfly effect
Shenker, S. H., & Stanford, D. (2014) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep03(2014)067 · Cited by 1,533
Towards a derivation of holographic entanglement entropy
Casini, H., Huerta, M., & Myers, R. C. (2011) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep05(2011)036 · Cited by 1,347
Cited by
Quantum bit threads and holographic entanglement
Agón, C. A., & Pedraza, J. F. (2022) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep02(2022)180 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Dutta, S., & Faulkner, T.
- Venue
- Journal of High Energy Physics
- Published
- 2021-03
- Volume
- 2021
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2943654704
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 86
- FWCI
- 11.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A canonical purification for the entanglement wedge cross-section. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/jhep03(2021)178
- The paper
- Dutta, S., & Faulkner, T. (2021). A canonical purification for the entanglement wedge cross-section. Journal of High Energy Physics. https://doi.org/10.1007/jhep03(2021)178
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.