CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 15

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multiverse in Karch-Randall Braneworld

Yadav, Gopal·2023·Journal of High Energy Physics
DOI 10.1007/jhep03(2023)103
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a model based on wedge holography that can describe the multiverse. In wedge holography, we consider two gravitating baths, one of which has strong gravity and the other one has weak gravity. To describe a multiverse, we consider 2 n Karch-Randall branes, and we propose that various d-dimensional universes are localized on these branes. These branes are embedded in (d + 1)-dimensional spacetime. The model is useful in obtaining the Page curve of black holes with multiple horizons and in the resolution of the “grandfather paradox”. We explicitly obtain the Page curves of eternal AdS black holes for n = 2 multiverse and Schwarzschild de-Sitter black hole with two horizons.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/jhep03(2023)103

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Description of wedge holography. Two d -dimensional Karch-Randall branes joined at the ( d -1) dimensional defect, Karch-Randall branes are embedded in ( d +1) -dimensional bulk.
Figure 1 Description of wedge holography. Two d -dimensional Karch-Randall branes joined at the ( d -1) dimensional defect, Karch-Randall branes are embedded in ( d +1) -dimensional bulk.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 2 2 n Karch-Randall branes, Q -n, -n +1 ,..., 1 , 2 ,...,n -1 ,n embedded in AdS d +1 . P is the defect. Multiverse is described by 2 n Karch-Randall branes which are d -dimensional objects and defect is ( d -1) -dimensional object.
Figure 2 2 n Karch-Randall branes, Q -n, -n +1 ,..., 1 , 2 ,...,n -1 ,n embedded in AdS d +1 . P is the defect. Multiverse is described by 2 n Karch-Randall branes which are d -dimensional objects and defect is ( d -1) -dimensional object.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 3 Cartoon picture of the multiverse for n = 3 in AdS spacetimes. P is the ( d -1) -dimensional defect and Karch-Randall branes are denoted by Q -1 / 1 , -2 / 2 , -3 / 3 .
Figure 3 Cartoon picture of the multiverse for n = 3 in AdS spacetimes. P is the ( d -1) -dimensional defect and Karch-Randall branes are denoted by Q -1 / 1 , -2 / 2 , -3 / 3 .CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 4 Cartoon picture of the multiverse for n = 3 with de-Sitter metric on Karch-Randall branes. P is the ( d -1) -dimensional defect and Karch-Randall branes are denoted by Q -1 / 1 , -2 / 2 , -3 / 3 .
Figure 4 Cartoon picture of the multiverse for n = 3 with de-Sitter metric on Karch-Randall branes. P is the ( d -1) -dimensional defect and Karch-Randall branes are denoted by Q -1 / 1 , -2 / 2 , -3 / 3 .CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 5 Braneworld consists of d -dimensional anti de-Sitter and de-Sitter spacetimes. AdS spacetimes are embedded in the bulk (3) where as de-Sitter spacetimes are embedded in the bulk spacetime with metric (15). We have used n 1 = n 2 = 3 to draw this figure.
Figure 5 Braneworld consists of d -dimensional anti de-Sitter and de-Sitter spacetimes. AdS spacetimes are embedded in the bulk (3) where as de-Sitter spacetimes are embedded in the bulk spacetime with metric (15). We have used n 1 = n 2 = 3 to draw this figure.CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 6
CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 7 Page curve of eternal AdS black holes for n = 2 multiverse.
Figure 7 Page curve of eternal AdS black holes for n = 2 multiverse.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 8 Realization of Schwarzschild de-Sitter black hole in wedge holography. I s and I c are black hole and cosmological island surfaces (black hole and de-Sitter horizons in our case). Red ( HM s ) and green ( HM c ) lines are Hartman-Maldacena surfaces for Schwarzschild and de-Sitter patches. Q s and Q 1 branes consist of Schwarzschild and de-Sitter patches. Q -s and Q -1 are baths to collect Hawking and Gibbons-Hawking radiation emitted by black hole and cosmological horizons.
Figure 8 Realization of Schwarzschild de-Sitter black hole in wedge holography. I s and I c are black hole and cosmological island surfaces (black hole and de-Sitter horizons in our case). Red ( HM s ) and green ( HM c ) lines are Hartman-Maldacena surfaces for Schwarzschild and de-Sitter patches. Q s and Q 1 branes consist of Schwarzschild and de-Sitter patches. Q -s and Q -1 are baths to collect Hawking and Gibbons-Hawking radiation emitted by black hole and cosmological horizons.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 9 Page curve of Schwarzschild patch.
Figure 9 Page curve of Schwarzschild patch.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 10 Different universes Q -1 , -2 , -3 , 1 , 2 , 3 where different people are living.
Figure 10 Different universes Q -1 , -2 , -3 , 1 , 2 , 3 where different people are living.CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 59

  1. J.M. Maldacena, The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 231 [hep-th/9711200] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Y. Ling et al., Reflected entropy in double holography, JHEP 02 (2022) 037 [arXiv:2109.09243] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  3. C. Krishnan, Critical Islands, JHEP 01 (2021) 179 [arXiv:2007.06551] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  4. E. Caceres, A. Kundu, A.K. Patra and S. Shashi, Page curves and bath deformations, SciPost Phys. Core 5 (2022) 033 [arXiv:2107.00022] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  5. E. Caceres, A. Kundu, A.K. Patra and S. Shashi, Warped information and entanglement islands in AdS/WCFT, JHEP 07 (2021) 004 [arXiv:2012.05425] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  6. A. Bhattacharya, A. Bhattacharyya, P. Nandy and A.K. Patra, Islands and complexity of eternal black hole and radiation subsystems for a doubly holographic model, JHEP 05 (2021) 135 [arXiv:2103.15852] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  7. A. Bhattacharya, A. Bhattacharyya, P. Nandy and A.K. Patra, Bath deformations, islands, and holographic complexity, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 066019 [arXiv:2112.06967] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  8. Q.-L. Hu, D. Li, R.-X. Miao and Y.-Q. Zeng, AdS/BCFT and Island for curvature-squared gravity, JHEP 09 (2022) 037 [arXiv:2202.03304] [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  9. Y. Ling, Y. Liu and Z.-Y. Xian, Island in Charged Black Holes, JHEP 03 (2021) 251 [arXiv:2010.00037] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  10. H. Omiya and Z. Wei, Causal structures and nonlocality in double holography, JHEP 07 (2022) 128 [arXiv:2107.01219] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  11. H. Geng et al., Entanglement phase structure of a holographic BCFT in a black hole background, JHEP 05 (2022) 153 [arXiv:2112.09132] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  12. M. Afrasiar, J. Kumar Basak, A. Chandra and G. Sengupta, Islands for Entanglement Negativity in Communicating Black Holes, arXiv:2205.07903 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  13. D. Basu, H. Parihar, V. Raj and G. Sengupta, Defect extremal surfaces for entanglement negativity, arXiv:2205.07905 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  14. Y. Liu, Z.-Y. Xian, C. Peng and Y. Ling, Addendum to: Black holes entangled by radiation, JHEP 11 (2022) 043 [arXiv:2205.14596] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  15. Z. Li and R.-Q. Yang, Upper bounds of holographic entanglement entropy growth rate for thermofield double states, JHEP 10 (2022) 072 [arXiv:2205.15154] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  16. F. Deng, Y.-S. An and Y. Zhou, JT gravity from partial reduction and defect extremal surface, JHEP 02 (2023) 219 [arXiv:2206.09609] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  17. C.F. Uhlemann, Islands and Page curves in 4d from Type IIB, JHEP 08 (2021) 104 [arXiv:2105.00008] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  18. S. Demulder, A. Gnecchi, I. Lavdas and D. Lust, Islands and light gravitons in type IIB string theory, JHEP 02 (2023) 016 [arXiv:2204.03669] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  19. A. Karch, H. Sun and C.F. Uhlemann, Double holography in string theory, JHEP 10 (2022) 012 [arXiv:2206.11292] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  20. H. Geng, Y. Nomura and H.-Y. Sun, Information paradox and its resolution in de Sitter holography, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 126004 [arXiv:2103.07477] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  21. G. Yadav and A. Misra, (”Swiss-Cheese”) Entanglement Entropy when Page-ing $$ \mathcal{M} $$ Theory Dual of Thermal QCD Above Tc at Intermediate Coupling, arXiv:2207.04048 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  22. H. Geng, L. Randall and E. Swanson, BCFT in a black hole background: an analytical holographic model, JHEP 12 (2022) 056 [arXiv:2209.02074] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  23. M. Afrasiar, J.K. Basak, A. Chandra and G. Sengupta, Reflected entropy for communicating black holes. Part I. Karch-Randall braneworlds, JHEP 02 (2023) 203 [arXiv:2211.13246] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  24. A. Karch and L. Randall, Locally localized gravity, JHEP 05 (2001) 008 [hep-th/0011156] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  25. A. Karch and L. Randall, Open and closed string interpretation of SUSY CFT’s on branes with boundaries, JHEP 06 (2001) 063 [hep-th/0105132] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  26. A. Galajinsky, Bianchi type-V spinning particle on S2, JHEP 03 (2020) 143 [arXiv:1912.13339] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  27. S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 181602 [hep-th/0603001] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  28. T. Hartman and J. Maldacena, Time Evolution of Entanglement Entropy from Black Hole Interiors, JHEP 05 (2013) 014 [arXiv:1303.1080] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  29. O. Aharony, O. DeWolfe, D.Z. Freedman and A. Karch, Defect conformal field theory and locally localized gravity, JHEP 07 (2003) 030 [hep-th/0303249] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  30. H. Geng and A. Karch, Massive islands, JHEP 09 (2020) 121 [arXiv:2006.02438] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  31. H. Geng et al., Information Transfer with a Gravitating Bath, SciPost Phys. 10 (2021) 103 [arXiv:2012.04671] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  32. H. Geng et al., Inconsistency of islands in theories with long-range gravity, JHEP 01 (2022) 182 [arXiv:2107.03390] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  33. R.-X. Miao, Massless Entanglement Island in Wedge Holography, arXiv:2212.07645 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  34. K. Ghosh and C. Krishnan, Dirichlet baths and the not-so-fine-grained Page curve, JHEP 08 (2021) 119 [arXiv:2103.17253] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  35. G.R. Dvali, G. Gabadadze and M. Porrati, 4-D gravity on a brane in 5-D Minkowski space, Phys. Lett. B 485 (2000) 208 [hep-th/0005016] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  36. C. Krishnan, V. Patil and J. Pereira, Page Curve and the Information Paradox in Flat Space, arXiv:2005.02993 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  37. C. Krishnan and V. Mohan, Interpreting the Bulk Page Curve: A Vestige of Locality on Holographic Screens, arXiv:2112.13783 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  38. H. Geng et al., Jackiw-Teitelboim Gravity from the Karch-Randall Braneworld, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 (2022) 231601 [arXiv:2206.04695] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  39. I. Akal, Y. Kusuki, T. Takayanagi and Z. Wei, Codimension two holography for wedges, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 126007 [arXiv:2007.06800] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  40. R.-X. Miao, An Exact Construction of Codimension two Holography, JHEP 01 (2021) 150 [arXiv:2009.06263] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  41. S. Choudhury and S. Panda, Entangled de Sitter from stringy axionic Bell pair I: an analysis using Bunch-Davies vacuum, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 52 [arXiv:1708.02265] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  42. S. Choudhury and S. Panda, Quantum entanglement in de Sitter space from stringy axion: An analysis using α vacua, Nucl. Phys. B 943 (2019) 114606 [arXiv:1712.08299] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  43. S. Choudhury et al., Circuit Complexity from Cosmological Islands, Symmetry 13 (2021) 1301 [arXiv:2012.10234] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  44. S. Choudhury, Entanglement negativity in de Sitter biverse from Stringy Axionic Bell pair: An analysis using Bunch-Davies vacuum, arXiv:2301.05203 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  45. P.-J. Hu and R.-X. Miao, Effective action, spectrum and first law of wedge holography, JHEP 03 (2022) 145 [arXiv:2201.02014] [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  46. H. Geng, Aspects of AdS2 quantum gravity and the Karch-Randall braneworld, JHEP 09 (2022) 024 [arXiv:2206.11277] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  47. N. Ogawa, T. Takayanagi, T. Tsuda and T. Waki, Wedge holography in flat space and celestial holography, Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 026001 [arXiv:2207.06735] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  48. N. Engelhardt and A.C. Wall, Quantum Extremal Surfaces: Holographic Entanglement Entropy beyond the Classical Regime, JHEP 01 (2015) 073 [arXiv:1408.3203] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  49. A. Strominger, The dS/CFT correspondence, JHEP 10 (2001) 034 [hep-th/0106113] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  50. J.M. Maldacena, Non-Gaussian features of primordial fluctuations in single field inflationary models, JHEP 05 (2003) 013 [astro-ph/0210603] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  51. A. Karch and L. Randall, Geometries with mismatched branes, JHEP 09 (2020) 166 [arXiv:2006.10061] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  52. J.M. Penín, K. Skenderis and B. Withers, Massive holographic QFTs in de Sitter, SciPost Phys. 12 (2022) 182 [arXiv:2112.14639] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  53. K. Hashimoto, N. Iizuka and Y. Matsuo, Islands in Schwarzschild black holes, JHEP 06 (2020) 085 [arXiv:2004.05863] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  54. G. Yadav and N. Joshi, Cosmological and black hole islands in multi-event horizon spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 026009 [arXiv:2210.00331] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  55. S. Chapman, D.A. Galante and E.D. Kramer, Holographic complexity and de Sitter space, JHEP 02 (2022) 198 [arXiv:2110.05522] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  56. G.W. Gibbons and S.W. Hawking, Cosmological event horizons, thermodynamics, and particle creation, Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977) 2738. · DOI · Paper page
  57. O.Y. Kupervasser, Grandfather Paradox in Non-Quantum and Quantum Gravitation Theories, Natural Science 06 (2014) 809. · DOI
  58. J.-H. Baek and K.-S. Choi, Islands in Proliferating de Sitter Spaces, arXiv:2212.14753 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  59. J. Maldacena and A. Milekhin, Humanly traversable wormholes, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 066007 [arXiv:2008.06618] [INSPIRE]. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 15

Metadata

Authors
Yadav, G.
ORCID
Yadav, Gopal
Venue
Journal of High Energy Physics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2023-03-15
Volume
2023
Issue
3
ISSN
1029-8479
DOI
10.1007/jhep03(2023)103
Cited by
15
References
3
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review