CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 35

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Causal structures and nonlocality in double holography

Omiya, Hidetoshi, Wei, Zixia·2022·Journal of High Energy Physics
DOI 10.1007/jhep07(2022)128
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Double holography plays a crucial role in recent studies of Hawking radiation and information paradox by relating an intermediate picture, in which a dynamical gravity living on an end-of-the-world brane is coupled to a non-gravitational heat bath, to a much better-understood BCFT picture as well as a bulk picture. In this paper, causal structures in generic double holographic setups are studied. We find that the causal structure in the bulk picture is compatible with causality in the BCFT picture, thanks to a generalization of the Gao-Wald theorem. On the other hand, consistency with the bulk causal structure requires the effective theory in the intermediate picture to contain a special type of super-luminal and nonlocal effect which is significant at long range or IR. These are confirmed by both geometrical analysis and commutators of microscopic fields. Subregion correspondences in double holography are discussed with the knowledge of this nonlocality. Possible fundamental origins of this nonlocality and its difference with other types of nonlocality will also be discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/jhep07(2022)128

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Concerns that double-holography leads to superluminal signalling are ameliorated when the brane description is treated as an effective theory, such that ETW brane models are consistent with causality.

    “Concerns that double-holography leads to superluminal signalling[60] are ameliorated when the brane description is treated as an effective theory, such that ETW brane models are consistent with causality[61].”

    From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [60]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 65

  1. A. Almheiri, N. Engelhardt, D. Marolf and H. Maxfield, The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole, JHEP 12 (2019) 063 [arXiv:1905.08762] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  2. A. Karch and L. Randall, Locally localized gravity, JHEP 05 (2001) 008 [hep-th/0011156] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  3. A. Karch and L. Randall, Open and closed string interpretation of SUSY CFT’s on branes with boundaries, JHEP 06 (2001) 063 [hep-th/0105132] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  4. T. Takayanagi, Holographic Dual of BCFT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 101602 [arXiv:1105.5165] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  5. M. Fujita, T. Takayanagi and E. Tonni, Aspects of AdS/BCFT, JHEP 11 (2011) 043 [arXiv:1108.5152] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  6. H. Z. Chen, R. C. Myers, D. Neuenfeld, I. A. Reyes and J. Sandor, Quantum Extremal Islands Made Easy. Part I. Entanglement on the Brane, JHEP 10 (2020) 166 [arXiv:2006.04851] [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  7. H. Z. Chen, R. C. Myers, D. Neuenfeld, I. A. Reyes and J. Sandor, Quantum Extremal Islands Made Easy. Part II. Black Holes on the Brane, JHEP 12 (2020) 025 [arXiv:2010.00018] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  8. I. Akal, Y. Kusuki, N. Shiba, T. Takayanagi and Z. Wei, Entanglement Entropy in a Holographic Moving Mirror and the Page Curve, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 061604 [arXiv:2011.12005] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  9. I. Akal, Y. Kusuki, N. Shiba, T. Takayanagi and Z. Wei, Holographic moving mirrors, Class. Quant. Grav. 38 (2021) 224001 [arXiv:2106.11179] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  10. A. May and D. Wakeham, Quantum tasks require islands on the brane, Class. Quant. Grav. 38 (2021) 144001 [arXiv:2102.01810] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  11. S. Gao and R. M. Wald, Theorems on gravitational time delay and related issues, Class. Quant. Grav. 17 (2000) 4999 [gr-qc/0007021] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  12. J. M. Maldacena, The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 231 [hep-th/9711200] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  13. S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov and A. M. Polyakov, Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory, Phys. Lett. B 428 (1998) 105 [hep-th/9802109] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  14. E. Witten, Anti-de Sitter space and holography, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 253 [hep-th/9802150] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  15. H. Ishihara, Causality of the brane universe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) 381 [gr-qc/0007070] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  16. L. Randall and R. Sundrum, An Alternative to compactification, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 4690 [hep-th/9906064] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  17. L. Randall and R. Sundrum, A Large mass hierarchy from a small extra dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 3370 [hep-ph/9905221] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  18. X. Dong, D. Harlow and A. C. Wall, Reconstruction of Bulk Operators within the Entanglement Wedge in Gauge-Gravity Duality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 021601 [arXiv:1601.05416] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  19. D. A. Lowe, J. Polchinski, L. Susskind, L. Thorlacius and J. Uglum, Black hole complementarity versus locality, Phys. Rev. D 52 (1995) 6997 [hep-th/9506138] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  20. S. B. Giddings, Locality in quantum gravity and string theory, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 106006 [hep-th/0604072] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  21. D. Neuenfeld, Homology conditions for RT surfaces in double holography, Class. Quant. Grav. 39 (2022) 075009 [arXiv:2105.01130] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  22. M. Nozaki, T. Takayanagi and T. Ugajin, Central Charges for BCFTs and Holography, JHEP 06 (2012) 066 [arXiv:1205.1573] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  23. I. Akal, Y. Kusuki, T. Takayanagi and Z. Wei, Codimension two holography for wedges, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 126007 [arXiv:2007.06800] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  24. K. Skenderis, Lecture notes on holographic renormalization, Class. Quant. Grav. 19 (2002) 5849 [hep-th/0209067] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  25. R. Bousso and L. Randall, Holographic domains of anti-de Sitter space, JHEP 04 (2002) 057 [hep-th/0112080] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  26. H. Geng and A. Karch, Massive islands, JHEP 09 (2020) 121 [arXiv:2006.02438] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  27. O. Aharony, O. DeWolfe, D. Z. Freedman and A. Karch, Defect conformal field theory and locally localized gravity, JHEP 07 (2003) 030 [hep-th/0303249] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  28. M. Porrati, Mass and gauge invariance 4. Holography for the Karch-Randall model, Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 044015 [hep-th/0109017] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  29. D. Neuenfeld, The Dictionary for Double Holography and Graviton Masses in d Dimensions, arXiv:2104.02801 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  30. N. Engelhardt and S. Fischetti, The Gravity Dual of Boundary Causality, Class. Quant. Grav. 33 (2016) 175004 [arXiv:1604.03944] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  31. N. Iizuka, A. Ishibashi and K. Maeda, The averaged null energy conditions in even dimensional curved spacetimes from AdS/CFT duality, JHEP 10 (2020) 106 [arXiv:2008.07942] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  32. S. W. Hawking and G. F. R. Ellis, The large scale structure of space-time. Vol. 1, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U.K. (1973). · DOI · Paper page
  33. E. Witten, Light Rays, Singularities, and All That, Rev. Mod. Phys. 92 (2020) 045004 [arXiv:1901.03928] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  34. P. Hayden and A. May, Summoning Information in Spacetime, or Where and When Can a Qubit Be?, J. Phys. A 49 (2016) 175304 [arXiv:1210.0913] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  35. A. May, Quantum tasks in holography, JHEP 10 (2019) 233 [Erratum ibid. 01 (2020) 080] [arXiv:1902.06845] [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  36. A. May, G. Penington and J. Sorce, Holographic scattering requires a connected entanglement wedge, JHEP 08 (2020) 132 [arXiv:1912.05649] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  37. A. May, Holographic quantum tasks with input and output regions, JHEP 08 (2021) 055 [arXiv:2101.08855] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  38. J. L. Cardy, Boundary conformal field theory, hep-th/0411189 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  39. S. E. McKeown, Formal theory of cornered asymptotically hyperbolic einstein metrics, J. Geom. Anal. 29 (2019) 1876 [arXiv:1708.02390]. · DOI
  40. R.-X. Miao, C.-S. Chu and W.-Z. Guo, New proposal for a holographic boundary conformal field theory, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 046005 [arXiv:1701.04275] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  41. C.-S. Chu, R.-X. Miao and W.-Z. Guo, On New Proposal for Holographic BCFT, JHEP 04 (2017) 089 [arXiv:1701.07202] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  42. L. McGough, M. Mezei and H. Verlinde, Moving the CFT into the bulk with $$ T\overline{T} $$, JHEP 04 (2018) 010 [arXiv:1611.03470] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  43. A. Lewkowycz, J. Liu, E. Silverstein and G. Torroba, $$ T\overline{T} $$ and EE, with implications for (A)dS subregion encodings, JHEP 04 (2020) 152 [arXiv:1909.13808] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  44. B. Grado-White, D. Marolf and S. J. Weinberg, Radial Cutoffs and Holographic Entanglement, JHEP 01 (2021) 009 [arXiv:2008.07022] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  45. A. B. Zamolodchikov, Expectation value of composite field $$ T\overline{T} $$ in two-dimensional quantum field theory, hep-th/0401146 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  46. F. A. Smirnov and A. B. Zamolodchikov, On space of integrable quantum field theories, Nucl. Phys. B 915 (2017) 363 [arXiv:1608.05499] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  47. J. Cardy, The $$ T\overline{T} $$ deformation of quantum field theory as random geometry, JHEP 10 (2018) 186 [arXiv:1801.06895] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  48. D. Harlow and D. Stanford, Operator Dictionaries and Wave Functions in AdS/CFT and dS/CFT, arXiv:1104.2621 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  49. E. D’Hoker and D. Z. Freedman, Supersymmetric gauge theories and the AdS/CFT correspondence, in Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics (TASI 2001): Strings, Branes and EXTRA Dimensions, Boulder, U.S.A. (2002), pg. 3 [hep-th/0201253] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  50. C. Fronsdal, Elementary particles in a curved space. ii, Phys. Rev. D 10 (1974) 589 [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  51. K. Skenderis and B. C. van Rees, Real-time gauge/gravity duality: Prescription, Renormalization and Examples, JHEP 05 (2009) 085 [arXiv:0812.2909] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  52. B. Czech, J. L. Karczmarek, F. Nogueira and M. Van Raamsdonk, The Gravity Dual of a Density Matrix, Class. Quant. Grav. 29 (2012) 155009 [arXiv:1204.1330] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  53. S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 181602 [hep-th/0603001] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  54. S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Aspects of Holographic Entanglement Entropy, JHEP 08 (2006) 045 [hep-th/0605073] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  55. C. Akers, J. Koeller, S. Leichenauer and A. Levine, Geometric Constraints from Subregion Duality Beyond the Classical Regime, arXiv:1610.08968 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  56. R. Bousso and E. Wildenhain, Gravity/ensemble duality, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 066005 [arXiv:2006.16289] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  57. N. Engelhardt and A. C. Wall, Quantum Extremal Surfaces: Holographic Entanglement Entropy beyond the Classical Regime, JHEP 01 (2015) 073 [arXiv:1408.3203] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  58. S. R. Coleman, Why There Is Nothing Rather Than Something: A Theory of the Cosmological Constant, Nucl. Phys. B 310 (1988) 643 [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  59. A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan and J. E. Santos, Entanglement islands in higher dimensions, SciPost Phys. 9 (2020) 001 [arXiv:1911.09666] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  60. H. Geng et al., Information Transfer with a Gravitating Bath, SciPost Phys. 10 (2021) 103 [arXiv:2012.04671] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  61. C. F. Uhlemann, Islands and Page curves in 4d from Type IIB, JHEP 08 (2021) 104 [arXiv:2105.00008] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  62. P. Gao, D. L. Jafferis and A. C. Wall, Traversable Wormholes via a Double Trace Deformation, JHEP 12 (2017) 151 [arXiv:1608.05687] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  63. J. Maldacena, D. Stanford and Z. Yang, Diving into traversable wormholes, Fortsch. Phys. 65 (2017) 1700034 [arXiv:1704.05333] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  64. D. Berenstein and D. Grabovsky, The Tortoise and the Hare: A Causality Puzzle in AdS/CFT, Class. Quant. Grav. 38 (2021) 105008 [arXiv:2011.08934] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  65. S. Hernández-Cuenca, G. T. Horowitz, G. Treviño and D. Wang, Boundary Causality Violating Metrics in Holography, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (2021) 8 [arXiv:2103.05014] [INSPIRE]. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Omiya, H., & Wei, Z.
ORCID
Wei, Zixia
Venue
Journal of High Energy Physics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2022-07
Volume
2022
Issue
7
ISSN
1029-8479
DOI
10.1007/jhep07(2022)128
Cited by
35
References
18
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review