CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 15Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsQuantum Electrodynamics and Casimir EffectNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories

Restricted Maximin surfaces and HRT in generic black hole spacetimes

Open access
Marolf, Donald, Wall, Aron C., Wang, Zhencheng·2019·Journal of High Energy Physics
DOI 10.1007/jhep05(2019)127
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The AdS/CFT understanding of CFT entanglement is based on HRT surfaces in the dual bulk spacetime. While such surfaces need not exist in sufficiently general spacetimes, the maximin construction demonstrates that they can be found in any smooth asymptotically locally AdS spacetime without horizons or with only Kasner-like singularities. In this work, we introduce restricted maximin surfaces anchored to a particular boundary Cauchy slice C ∂ . We show that the result agrees with the original unrestricted maximin prescription when the restricted maximin surface lies in a smooth region of spacetime. We then use this construction to extend the existence theorem for HRT surfaces to generic charged or spinning AdS black holes whose mass-inflation singularities are not Kasner-like. We also discuss related issues in time-independent charged wormholes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/jhep05(2019)127

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The existence proof for maximin surfaces was extended to generic black holes in AdS with singularities that are not Kasner-like.

    “This existence proof was then extended to generic blackholes in Ad S with singularities that are not Kasner like [87].”

    From Holographic spacetime, black holes and quantum error correcting codes: a review (2022) · cites this paper as [87]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Marolf, D., Wall, A. C., & Wang, Z.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Wang, Zhencheng
ORCID
Wang, Zhencheng
Venue
Journal of High Energy Physics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2019-05
Volume
2019
Issue
5
ISSN
1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1007/jhep05(2019)127
OpenAlex
W2909389065
Cited by
15
References
26
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of High Energy Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Keywords
Ryu-Takayanagi surface, entanglement entropy, AdS/CFT correspondence, black holes, mass inflation, charged black holes, rotating black holes, wormholes, holography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review