Cited by 9Quantum many-body systemsBlack Holes and Theoretical PhysicsAlgebraic structures and combinatorial models

Tensor chain and constraints in tensor networks

Open access
Ling, Yi, Liu, Yuxuan, Xian, Zhuo-Yu, Xiao, Yikang·2019·Journal of High Energy Physics

Abstract

We develop our recent work on quantum error correction (QEC) and entanglement spectrum (ES) in tensor networks (arXiv:1806.05007). We propose a general framework for planar tensor network state with tensor constraints as a model for AdS 3/CFT 2 correspondence, which could be viewed as a generalization of hyperinvariant tensor networks recently proposed by Evenbly. We elaborate our proposal on tensor chains in a tensor network by tiling H 2 space and provide a diagrammatical description for general multi-tensor constraints in terms of tensor chains, which forms a generalized greedy algorithm. The behavior of tensor chains under the action of greedy algorithm is investigated in detail. In particular, for a given set of tensor constraints, a critically protected (CP) tensor chain can be figured out and evaluated by its average reduced interior angle. We classify tensor networks according to their ability of QEC and the flatness of ES. The corresponding geometric description of critical protection over the hyperbolic space is also given.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/jhep06(2019)032

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Three-valent intertwiners, as well as two-valent vertices with linear independent tangent vectors, are eigenstates of S_v as shown in [45].

    “Three-valent intertwiners, as well as two-valent vertices with linear independent tangent vectors are eigenstates of S v as shown in [45].”
  • Two-valent vertices with spin j and non-parallel tangent vectors are also eigenstates and contribute with eigenvalue j(j+1) as shown in Ref. [45].

    “Furthermore, two-valent vertices with spin j and non-parallel tangent vectors are also eigenstates and contribute with an eigenvalue j(j + 1) as shown in Ref. [45].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ling, Y., Liu, Y., Xian, Z.-Y., & Xiao, Y.
Affiliations
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
Xiao, Yikang
Venue
Journal of High Energy Physics
Published
2019-06
Volume
2019
Issue
6
ISSN
1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2949379296
Cited by
8
References
43
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
FWCI
0.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of High Energy Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (11847229, 11875053, 11575195)
  • China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (BX20180318)
  • National Postdoctoral Program for Innovative Talents (BX20180318)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
Keywords
tensor networks, quantum error correction, entanglement spectrum, AdS3/CFT2 correspondence, hyperbolic space, greedy algorithm

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review