Cited by 96Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesQuantum chaos and dynamical systems

The volume of the black hole interior at late times

Open access
Iliesiu, Luca V., Mezei, Márk, Sárosi, Gábor·2022·Journal of High Energy Physics

Abstract

Understanding the fate of semi-classical black hole solutions at very late times is one of the most important open questions in quantum gravity. In this paper, we provide a path integral definition of the volume of the black hole interior and study it at arbitrarily late times for black holes in various models of two-dimensional gravity. Because of a novel universal cancellation between the contributions of the semi-classical black hole spectrum and some of its non-perturbative corrections, we find that, after a linear growth at early times, the length of the interior saturates at a time, and towards a value, that is exponentially large in the entropy of the black hole. This provides a non-perturbative test of the complexity equals volume proposal since complexity is also expected to plateau at the same value and at the same time.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/jhep07(2022)073

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Including wormhole corrections to the black hole interior volume computation leads to a saturation of the growth at the timescale where non-perturbative random matrix effects kick in.

    “The result is a saturation of the growth of the black hole interior size at the timescale where non-perturbative random matrix effects kick in .”

    From Solvable models of quantum black holes: a review on Jackiw–Teitelboim gravity (2023) · cites this paper as Iliesiu et al. 2022

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Iliesiu, L. V., Mezei, M., & Sárosi, G.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Simons Center for Geometry and Physics (US)
  • European Organization for Nuclear Research (CH)
Corresponding author
  • Iliesiu, Luca V.
  • Mezei, Márk
  • Sárosi, Gábor
Venue
Journal of High Energy Physics
Published
2022-07
Volume
2022
Issue
7
ISSN
1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3178119464
Cited by
96
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of High Energy Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (public-domain)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Quantum chaos and dynamical systems
Keywords
late-time behavior, two-dimensional gravity, path integral, non-perturbative corrections, black hole spectrum, black hole entropy, quantum gravity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review