Cited by 427Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsQuantum many-body systemsNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories

Entanglement is not enough

Open access
Susskind, Leonard·2016·Fortschritte der Physik

Abstract

This is the written version of a lecture given at KITP in Oct 2014 on Black Holes and quantum complexity. I've included (in boldface) various questions that came up during the lecture and discussions the following day, as well as the quantitative calculations that form the basis of the arguments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/prop.201500095

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The wormhole is getting longer.

    “This is the fact that the wormhole is getting longer [62, 63].”

    From Replica wormholes and the entropy of Hawking radiation (2020) · cites this paper as [63]

  • The entropy of region R without considering the island grows linearly with time t_b, S_Hawking ∼ πc/(6β) t_b.

    “The entropy of region R without considering the island grows linearly with time t b , S Hawking ∼ πc 6β t b .”

    From Replica wormholes for an evaporating 2D black hole (2021) · cites this paper as [69]

    Section 2.1 (page unavailable) discusses Hawking emission, while section 3.3 describes a global entropy assigned to Einstein–Rosen-bridge causal patches. Neither gives the entropy of a radiation region R without an island or the claimed πc/(6β) growth rate; searches for those terms and for radiation-entropy growth found no matching passage. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [30]30. S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford, JHEP 1403, 067 (2014) [arXiv:1306.0622 [hep-th]]. · arXiv
  2. [31]31. S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford, arXiv:1312.3296 [hep-th]. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Susskind, L.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Susskind, Leonard
Venue
Fortschritte der Physik
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-01
Volume
64
Issue
1
Pages
49-71
ISSN
  • 0015-8208 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-3978
OpenAlex
W2162408901
Cited by
427
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 4
FWCI
22.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fortschritte der Physik (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0756174)
  • John Templeton Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Keywords
black holes, quantum complexity, quantum entanglement, quantum chaos, black hole information

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review