Kompetenzorientiert prüfen im Staatsexamen Medizin
Open accessAbstract
In Germany, future physicians have to pass a national licensing examination at the end of their medical studies. Passing this examination is the requirement for the license to practice medicine. The Masterplan Medizinstudium 2020 with its 41 measures aims to shift the paradigm in medical education and medical licensing examinations.The main goals of the Masterplan include the development towards competency-based and practical medical education and examination as well as the strengthening of general medicine. The healthcare policy takes into account social developments, which are very important for the medical education and licensing examination.Seven measures of the Masterplan relate to the realignment of the licensing examinations. Their function to drive learning should better support students in achieving the study goal defined in the German Medical Licensure Act: to educate a medical doctor scientifically and practically who is qualified for autonomous and independent professional practice, postgraduate education and continuous training.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The German medical licensing examination has a high interexamination reliability of over 0.9.
“While the German medical licensing examination covers various medical subdisciplines in 320 multiple-choice questions [18], it has a high interexamination reliability of over 0.9 [19].”
From Comparison of the Performance of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 With That of Medical Students on the Written German Medical Licensing Examination: Observational Study (2024) · cites this paper as [19]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Frenk, J., Chen, L., Bhutta, Z. A., Cohen, J., Crisp, N., Evans, T., Fineberg, H., Garcia, P., Ke, Y., Kelley, P., et al. (2010) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61854-5 · Cited by 5,960 · see citing works
Assessment in medical education
Epstein, R. M. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra054784 · Cited by 1,872 · see citing works
A model for programmatic assessment fit for purpose.
van der Vleuten, C. P. M., Schuwirth, L. W. T., Driessen, E. W., Dijkstra, J., Tigelaar, D., Baartman, L. K. J., & van Tartwijk, J. (2012) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.3109/0142159x.2012.652239 · Cited by 892 · see citing works
Canale, S. D., Louis, D. Z., Maio, V., Wang, X., Rossi, G., Hojat, M., & Gonnella, J. S. (2012) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e3182628fbf · Cited by 512 · see citing works
Carraccio, C. L., Englander, R., Gilhooly, J. T., Mink, R. B., Hofkosh, D., Barone, M., & Holmboe, E. S. (2016) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000001141 · Cited by 252 · see citing works
Evaluating The Quality Of Care Provided By Graduates Of International Medical Schools
Norcini, J. J., Boulet, J. R., Dauphinée, W. D., Opalek, A., Krantz, I. D., & Anderson, S. T. (2010) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0222 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Fischer, M. R., Bauer, D., Mohn, K., & NKLM-Projektgruppe (2015) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · doi:10.3205/zma000977 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Raupach, T., Brown, J., Anders, S., Hasenfuss, G. P., & Harendza, S. (2013) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/1741-7015-11-61 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Assessing competencies using milestones along the way
Tekian, A. S., Hodges, B. D., Roberts, T. E., Schuwirth, L., & Norcini, J. J. (2014) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.3109/0142159x.2014.993954 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Practical Guide to Medical Student Assessment
Amin, Z., Seng, C. Y., & Eng, K. H. (2006) · WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks · doi:10.1142/6109 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Masterplan Medizinstudium 2020
Wulf, H. (2017) · AINS - Anästhesiologie · Intensivmedizin · Notfallmedizin · Schmerztherapie · doi:10.1055/s-0043-109409 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Medical Licensing Examinations in the United States
Melnick, D. E., Dillon, G. F., & Swanson, D. B. (2002) · Journal of Dental Education · doi:10.1002/j.0022-0337.2002.66.5.tb03537.x · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Pattern recognition as a concept for multiple-choice questions in a national licensing exam
Freiwald, T., Salimi, M., Khaljani, E., & Harendza, S. (2014) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/1472-6920-14-232 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Improvement of reliability of an oral examination by a structured evaluation instrument
Yang, J. C., & Laube, D. W. (1983) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-198311000-00005 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
The FRCR 2B oral examination: Is it reliable?
Yeung, A., Booth, T. C., Larkin, T., McCoubrie, P., & McKnight, L. (2012) · Clinical Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.crad.2012.10.010 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Kraemer H-J, Duppré HJ, Boelcke G, Michaelis J, Voigtmann K (1976) IMPP. Aufgaben, Entwicklung, Analysen mit über 350 Original-Prüfungsfragen. Druckhaus Schmidt & Bödige, Mainz 13. Thieme (2017) Examen online. https:// examenonline.thieme.de/. Zugegriffen: 13. Sept. 2017
- FrenkJ,ChenL,BhuttaZAetal(2010)Healthprofes- sionals for a new century: transforming education tostrengthenhealthsystemsinaninterdependent world. Lancet 376(9756):1923-1958
- van den Bussche H, Wegscheider K, Zimmermann T (2006) Der Ausbildungserfolg im Vergleich (III). Zwischen den Ergebnissen im schriftlichen und im mündlichenTeilderÄrztlichenVorprüfungbesteht an den Hochschulen nur ein geringer Zusammen- hang. Dtsch Arztebl Int 103(47):3170-3176
- FischerMR, BauerD, MohnK(2015)Finallyfinished! Nationalcompetencebasedcataloguesoflearning objectives for undergraduate medical education (NKLM) and dental education (NKLZ) ready for trial. Gms Z Med Ausbild 32(3):35
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Meyer, A., Riese, J., & Streichert, T. (2024) · JMIR Medical Education · doi:10.2196/50965 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
- Authors
- Jünger, J.
- Corresponding author
- Jünger, Jana
- ORCID
- Jünger, Jana
- Venue
- Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz
- Published
- 2017-12-11
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 171-177
- ISSN
- 0007-5914 (ISSN-L)
- 1436-9990
- 1437-1588
- OpenAlex
- W2772143270
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5
- FWCI
- 0.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- de
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical Education and Admissions
- Keywords
- competency-based assessment, medical licensing examinations, state medical examination, medical education reform, general medicine
- MeSH terms
- Clinical Competence, Competency-Based Education, Curriculum, Education, Medical, Education, Medical, Continuing, Education, Medical, Graduate, Forecasting, Germany, Goals, Humans, Licensure, Medical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
