Cited by 512Empathy and Medical EducationDiabetes Management and EducationPatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

The Relationship Between Physician Empathy and Disease Complications: An Empirical Study of Primary Care Physicians and Their Diabetic Patients in Parma, Italy

Canale, Stefano Del, Louis, Daniel Z., Maio, Vittorio, Wang, Xiaohong, Rossi, Giuseppina, Hojat, Mohammadreza, Gonnella, Joseph S.·2012·Academic Medicine

Abstract

PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that scores of a validated measure of physician empathy are associated with clinical outcomes for patients with diabetes mellitus. METHOD: This retrospective correlational study included 20,961 patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus from a population of 284,298 adult patients in the Local Health Authority, Parma, Italy, enrolled with one of 242 primary care physicians for the entire year of 2009. Participating physicians' Jefferson Scale of Empathy scores were compared with occurrence of acute metabolic complications (hyperosmolar state, diabetic ketoacidosis, coma) in diabetes patients hospitalized in 2009. RESULTS: Patients of physicians with high empathy scores, compared with patients of physicians with moderate and low empathy scores, had a significantly lower rate of acute metabolic complications (4.0, 7.1, and 6.5 per 1,000 patients, respectively, P < .05). Logistic regression analysis showed physicians' empathy scores were associated with acute metabolic complications: odds ratio (OR) = 0.59 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37-0.95, contrasting physicians with high and low empathy scores). Patients' age (≥69 years) also contributed to the prediction of acute metabolic complications: OR = 1.7 (95% CI, 1.2-1.4). Physicians' gender and age, patients' gender, type of practice (solo, association), geographical location of practice (mountain, hills, plain), and length of time the patient had been enrolled with the physician were not associated with acute metabolic complications. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that physician empathy is significantly associated with clinical outcome for patients with diabetes mellitus and should be considered an important component of clinical competence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/acm.0b013e3182628fbf

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Canale, S. D., Louis, D. Z., Maio, V., Wang, X., Rossi, G., Hojat, M., & Gonnella, J. S.
Affiliations
Thomas Jefferson University (US)
Corresponding author
Louis, Daniel Z.
Venue
Academic Medicine
Published
2012-09
Volume
87
Issue
9
Pages
1243-1249
ISSN
1040-2446 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2114067207
Cited by
512
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 1
FWCI
17.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Academic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
physician empathy, diabetes mellitus, diabetic ketoacidosis, hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state, diabetic coma, Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy, clinical outcomes, primary care physicians, elderly patients, clinical competence
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Diabetes Mellitus, Empathy, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Italy, Male, Physician-Patient Relations, Retrospective Studies, Logistic Models, Diabetes Complications, Physicians, Primary Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review