Cited by 165Paleontology and Evolutionary BiologyFossil Insects in AmberEvolution and Paleontology Studies

Insight into the evolution of avian flight from a new clade of Early Cretaceous ornithurines from China and the morphology of Yixianornis grabaui

Open access
Clarke, Julia A., Zhou, Zhonghe, Zhang, Fucheng·2006·Journal of Anatomy

Abstract

In studies of the evolution of avian flight there has been a singular preoccupation with unravelling its origin. By contrast, the complex changes in morphology that occurred between the earliest form of avian flapping flight and the emergence of the flight capabilities of extant birds remain comparatively little explored. Any such work has been limited by a comparative paucity of fossils illuminating bird evolution near the origin of the clade of extant (i.e. ‘modern’) birds (Aves). Here we recognize three species from the Early Cretaceous of China as comprising a new lineage of basal ornithurine birds. Ornithurae is a clade that includes, approximately, comparatively close relatives of crown clade Aves (extant birds) and that crown clade. The morphology of the best‐preserved specimen from this newly recognized Asian diversity, the holotype specimen of Yixianornis grabaui Zhou and Zhang 2001 , complete with finely preserved wing and tail feather impressions, is used to illustrate the new insights offered by recognition of this lineage. Hypotheses of avian morphological evolution and specifically proposed patterns of change in different avian locomotor modules after the origin of flight are impacted by recognition of the new lineage. The complete articulated holotype specimen of Yixianornis grabaui , from the Early Cretaceous Jiufotang Formation of Liaoning Province, in north‐eastern China, arguably the best‐preserved basal ornithurine specimen yet discovered, provides the earliest evidence consistent with the presence of extant avian tail feather fanning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2006.00534.x

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 60 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clarke, J. A., Zhou, Z., & Zhang, F.
Affiliations
  • North Carolina State University (US)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
Clarke, Julia A.
Venue
Journal of Anatomy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-03
Volume
208
Issue
3
Pages
287-308
ISSN
  • 0021-8782 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7580
OpenAlex
W2060028132
Cited by
165
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 11
FWCI
6.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Anatomy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Museum of Natural History
  • North Carolina State University
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fossil Insects in Amber
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
avian flight evolution, Ornithurae, basal birds, Lower Cretaceous, Jiufotang Formation, holotype
MeSH terms
Animals, Birds, Bone and Bones, China, Biological Evolution, Feathers, Flight, Animal, Fossils, Phylogeny, Tail

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review