Cited by 434Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Insulin glargine or NPH combined with metformin in type 2 diabetes: The LANMET study

Open access
Yki-Järvinen, H., Kauppinen-Mäkelin, R., Tiikkainen, M., Vähätalo, M., Virtamo, H., Nikkilä, K., Tulokas, T., Hulme, S. +7 more·2006·Diabetologia

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis In type 2 diabetic patients we compared 9 months of combination therapy with insulin glargine and metformin with 9 months of NPH insulin combined with metformin. The primary focus was changes in HbA(1c); secondary focus was diurnal glucose profiles and symptomatic hypoglycaemia.Methods In this investigator-initiated open, parallel-group clinical trial involving seven centres, 110 insulin-naive type 2 diabetic patients with poor glycaemic control (HbA(1c) >or=8.0%) on oral hypoglycaemic agents (90% using sulfonylurea plus metformin) were randomised to receive bedtime insulin glargine with metformin (G+MET) or bedtime NPH with metformin (NPH+MET) for 36 weeks. The patients were taught how to self-adjust their insulin dose and use a modem to send the results of home glucose monitoring to treatment centres. The goal was to achieve a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) of 4.0 to 5.5 mmol/l in both groups.Results During the last 12 weeks, FPGs averaged 5.75+/-0.02 and 5.96+/-0.03 mmol/l (p<0.001) and insulin doses were 68+/-5 and 70+/-6 IU/day (0.69+/-0.05 and 0.66+/-0.04 IU kg(-1) day(-1), NS) in the G+MET and NPH+MET groups, respectively. At 36 weeks, mean HbA(1c) was 7.14+/-0.12 and 7.16+/-0.14%, respectively (NS). Symptomatic, but not confirmed symptomatic, hypoglycaemia was significantly lower during the first 12 weeks in the G+MET group (4.1+/-0.8 episodes/patient-year) than in the NPH+MET group (9.0+/-2.3 episodes/patient-year, p<0.05), but not significantly different thereafter. Glucose levels before dinner were higher in the NPH+MET group (10.1+/-0.3 mmol/l) than in the G+MET group (8.6+/-0.3 mmol/l, p=0.002) throughout the 36-week study. With regard to baseline characteristics such as initial glycaemia or C-peptide, there was no difference between patients who achieved good glycaemic control (HbA(1c) <7.0%) and those who did not. Differences were seen in the following: between study centres, weight gain during the run-in period and insulin therapy, and FPG during the last 12 weeks (5.7+/-0.2 vs 6.7+/-0.3 mmol/l for patients reaching vs those not reaching target, p<0.01).Conclusions/interpretation Good glycaemic control can be achieved with both G+MET and NPH+MET. Use of G+MET reduces symptomatic hypoglycaemia during the first 12 weeks and dinner time hyperglycaemia compared with NPH+MET.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00125-005-0132-0

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several insulin treat-to-target trials have safely used dose titration protocols in individuals not at target A1C to reach lower than traditional FPG and PPG targets, including FPG levels of 4.5 to 5.5 mmol/L in type 2 diabetes, FPG levels of 4.0 to 5.5 mmol/L in type 2 diabetes, FPG levels of 3.9 to 5.0 mmol/L in type 1 diabetes, and protocols targeting both FPG 4.5-5.5 and 2-hour PG 5.0-7.0 in类型

    “In addition, several insulin treat-to-target trials have safely used dose titration protocols in individuals not at target A1C to reach lower than”

    From Targets for Glycemic Control (2018) · cites this paper as [44]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yki-Järvinen, H., Kauppinen-Mäkelin, R., Tiikkainen, M., Vähätalo, M., Virtamo, H., Nikkilä, K., Tulokas, T., Hulme, S., Hardy, K., McNulty, S., Hänninen, J., Levänen, H., Lahdenperä, S., Lehtonen, R., & Ryysy, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • Jorvi Hospital (FI)
  • Turku City Hospital (FI)
  • Lapland Central Hospital (FI)
  • Whiston Hospital (GB)
  • Mikkelin keskussairaala (FI)
  • Sanofi (Finland) (FI)
  • Kymenlaakson keskussairaala (FI)
Corresponding author
Yki-Järvinen, H.
Venue
Diabetologia
Published
2006-02-03
Volume
49
Issue
3
Pages
442-451
ISSN
  • 0012-186X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0428
OpenAlex
W1968865647
Cited by
434
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 28
FWCI
32.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Diabetes Association
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • European Foundation for the Study of Diabetes
  • Academy of Finland
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, insulin glargine, NPH insulin, metformin, basal insulin therapy, HbA1c, fasting blood glucose, insulin dose adjustment, home blood glucose monitoring, insulin-naive patients, sulfonylureas, glycemic control
MeSH terms
Insulin Glargine, Adult, Aged, Blood Glucose, Body Weight, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Drug Therapy, Combination, Fasting, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Insulin, Insulin, Isophane, Liver, Male, Metformin, Middle Aged, Insulin, Long-Acting, Lipid Metabolism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review