Cited by 61Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and ManagementSex and Gender in Healthcare

Effect of gender on treatment outcomes in type 2 diabetes mellitus

McGill, J.B., Vlajnic, A., Knutsen, P.G., Recklein, C., Rimler, M., Fisher, S.J.·2013·Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice

Abstract

Aim To evaluate the effect of gender on clinical outcomes in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) receiving antidiabetes therapy.Methods This is a pooled analysis from nine similarly designed phase 3 and 4 randomized, controlled studies evaluating insulin glargine and an active comparator (NPH insulin, insulin lispro, premixed insulin, oral antidiabetes drugs, dietary intervention) in adults with T2DM. Impact of gender on outcomes including HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), weight-adjusted insulin dose, and hypoglycemia incidence was evaluated after 24 weeks of treatment.Results Overall, 1651 male and 1287 female individuals were included; 49.8% and 50.2% were treated with insulin glargine or comparators, respectively. Females receiving insulin glargine were less likely than males to achieve a glycemic target of HbA1c≤7.0% (53mmol/mol) (54.3% vs 60.8%, respectively, p=0.0162); there was no difference between females and males receiving comparators (52.7% vs 51.3%, respectively, p=0.4625). Females had significantly greater reductions in FPG (3.1mg/dL, p=0.0458), required significantly higher insulin doses (0.03IU/kg, p=0.0071), and had significantly higher annual rates of symptomatic (p<0.0001), glucose-confirmed (<50 and <70mg/dL) symptomatic (p=0.0005 and p<0.0001), and severe hypoglycemia (p=0.0020) than males.Conclusions Females in this analysis had smaller reductions in HbA1c and were less likely to reach glycemic goals despite higher insulin doses and more hypoglycemic events than males. Differences in gender responses to therapy should be considered when individualizing treatment for people with T2DM.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.diabres.2013.10.001

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McGill, J. B., Vlajnic, A., Knutsen, P. G., Recklein, C., Rimler, M., & Fisher, S. J.
Affiliations
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Sanofi (United States) (US)
  • Medpace (United States) (US)
Venue
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-12
Volume
102
Issue
3
Pages
167-174
ISSN
0168-8227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2062014697
Cited by
61
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Sanofi
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Sex and Gender in Healthcare
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, gender differences, insulin glargine, glycemic control, HbA1c, fasting blood glucose, hypoglycemia, insulin dose, sex differences in treatment response
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Glucose, Body Weight, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Sex Factors, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic, Clinical Trials, Phase IV as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review