Cited by 34Digital Economy and Work TransformationLegal and Labor StudiesLabor market dynamics and wage inequality

Digitalisation and the regulation of work: theoretical issues and normative challenges

Salento, Angelo·2018·AI & SOCIETY

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00146-017-0738-z

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other battles are about the right to privacy of workers and the development of regulatory frameworks to give an ethical frame to AI development.

    “Other battles are about the right to privacy of workers (De Stefano 2020 for Europe) and the development of regulatory frameworks to give an ethical frame to AI development (Salento 2018).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Salento, A.
Affiliations
University of Salento (IT)
Corresponding author
Salento, Angelo
Venue
AI & SOCIETY
Published
2017-06-30
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
369-378
ISSN
  • 0951-5666 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-5655
OpenAlex
W2724653373
Cited by
34
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
5.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • AI & Society (publishedVersion)
  • AIRUS (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Legal and Labor Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
Keywords
Industry 4.0, digitalization of work, regulation of work, industrial policy, technological transition, work organization, machine design, normative questions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review