Cited by 66Ethics and Social Impacts of AICybernetics and Technology in SocietyArtificial Intelligence Applications

Psychoanalyzing artificial intelligence: the case of Replika

Possati, Luca M.·2023·AI & SOCIETY

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00146-021-01379-7

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals may form emotionally meaningful relationships with AI systems, as illustrated by the popularity of applications such as Replika.

    “In some cases, individuals may even form emotionally meaningful relationships with AI systems, as illustrated by the popularity of applications such as Replika (Possati 2022).”

    From Machine marketing: rethinking the customer in the age of generative AI (2026) · cites this paper as Possati 2022

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Possati, L. M.
Affiliations
Universidade do Porto (PT)
Corresponding author
Possati, Luca M.
Venue
AI & SOCIETY
Published
2022-01-07
Volume
38
Issue
4
Pages
1725-1738
ISSN
  • 0951-5666 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-5655
OpenAlex
W4205638930
Cited by
65
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 1
FWCI
15.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
AI & Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
Keywords
Replika, chatbots, artificial intelligence design, unconscious processes, psychoanalysis, dehumanization, psychological support, mourning, artificial intelligence control, AI responsibility, psychosocial approach

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review