Cited by 53Academic integrity and plagiarismEthics and Social Impacts of AIArtificial Intelligence in Education

Balancing AI and academic integrity: what are the positions of academic publishers and universities?

Gulumbe, Bashar Haruna, Audu, Shuaibu Muhammad, Hashim, Abubakar Muhammad·2025·AI & SOCIETY

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00146-024-01946-8

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gulumbe, B. H., Audu, S. M., & Hashim, A. M.
Affiliations
Federal University Birnin Kebbi (NG)
Corresponding author
Gulumbe, Bashar Haruna
Venue
AI & SOCIETY
Published
2024-04-27
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
1775-1784
ISSN
  • 0951-5666 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-5655
OpenAlex
W4395693625
Cited by
53
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 2
FWCI
21.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
AI & Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
Keywords
artificial intelligence in academia, academic integrity, academic publishers, universities, AI guidelines, AI regulation, research ethics, scholarly publishing, AI policy implementation, academic rigor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review