Cited by 51Manufacturing Process and OptimizationDigital Transformation in IndustryFlexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems

Working mode in aircraft manufacturing based on digital coordination model

Guo, Feiyan, Zou, Fang, Liu, Jianhua, Wang, Zhongqi·2018·The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00170-018-2048-0

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A digital twin called 'installer base management system' assists in data structuring and management of machines.

    “with the construction of a DT called 'installer base management system' that assists in data structuring and management of machines [25]”

    From Review of digital twin applications in manufacturing (2019) · cites this paper as [25]

  • The dataset description is explicitly mentioned in only nineteen reviewed articles.

    “The dataset description is showed only in nineteen articles: in four cases a description is done using Unified Modeling Language (UML) [25,51,63,73], in one case only with the Sequence Diagram (SD) [75].”

    From Review of digital twin applications in manufacturing (2019) · cites this paper as [25]

  • In four reviewed articles, the dataset description is done using Unified Modeling Language (UML).

    “in four cases a description is done using Unified Modeling Language (UML) [25,51,63,73]”

    From Review of digital twin applications in manufacturing (2019) · cites this paper as [25]

  • Two reviewed articles use a prediction model.

    “In two cases is used a prediction model [25,63]”

    From Review of digital twin applications in manufacturing (2019) · cites this paper as [25]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guo, F., Zou, F., Liu, J., & Wang, Z.
Affiliations
  • AVIC Manufacturing Technology Institute (China) (CN)
  • Beijing Institute of Technology (CN)
  • Northwestern Polytechnical University (CN)
Corresponding author
Guo, Feiyan
Venue
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
Published
2018-06-21
Volume
98
Issue
5-8
Pages
1547-1571
ISSN
  • 0268-3768 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-3015
OpenAlex
W2809658813
Cited by
51
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6
FWCI
4.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Defense Industrial Technology Development Program of China (JCKY2016205A001)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Manufacturing Process and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems
Keywords
aircraft assembly, digital twin, error propagation, dynamic feedback control, flexible tooling, assembly efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review