Cited by 253Digital Transformation in IndustryBIM and Construction IntegrationInfrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring

Towards Civil Engineering 4.0: Concept, workflow and application of Digital Twins for existing infrastructure

Open access
Pregnolato, M., Gunner, S., Voyagaki, E., De Risi, R., Carhart, N., Gavriel, G., Tully, P., Tryfonas, T. +2 more·2022·Automation in Construction

Abstract

Digital Twins (DTs) are forecasted to be used in two-thirds of large industrial companies in the next decade. In the Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC) sector, their actual application is still largely at the prototype stage. Industry and academia are currently reconciling many competing definitions and unclear processes for developing DTs. There is a compelling need to establish DTs as practice in AEC by developing common procedures and standards tailored to the sector's procedures and use cases. This paper proposes a step-by-step workflow process for developing a DT for an existing asset in the built environment, providing a proof-of-concept case study based on the Clifton Suspension Bridge in Bristol (UK). To achieve its aim, this paper (i) reviews the state-of-the-art of DTs in Civil Engineering, (ii) proposes a working DT-based workflow framework for the built environment applicable to existing assets, (iii) applies the framework and develops of the physical-virtual architecture to a case study of bridge management, and finally ( iv ) discusses insights from the application. The main novelty lies in the development of a versatile methodological framework that can be applied to the broad context of civil infrastructure. This paper's importance resides in the knowledge challenge, value proposition and operation dictated by developing a DT workflow for the built environment, which ultimately represents a relevant use case for the digital transformation of national infrastructure.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104421

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pregnolato, M., Gunner, S., Voyagaki, E., De Risi, R., Carhart, N., Gavriel, G., Tully, P., Tryfonas, T., Macdonald, J., & Taylor, C.
Affiliations
University of Bristol (GB)
Corresponding author
Pregnolato, M.
Venue
Automation in Construction
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-09
Volume
141
Pages
104421
ISSN
0926-5805 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4283784269
Cited by
253
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 52 · 2025: 81 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 2
FWCI
23.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Automation in Construction (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/R013411/1, EP/R00742X/2, EP/P016782, EP/P016782/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › BIM and Construction Integration
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Keywords
digital twin, existing infrastructure, bridge management, Clifton Suspension Bridge, AEC industry, infrastructure asset management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review