The DOI matches its Crossref record; 104 of the 104 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A comprehensive review on metallic implant biomaterials and their subtractive manufacturing
Open accessAbstract
There is a tremendous increase in the demand for converting biomaterials into high-quality industrially manufactured human body parts, also known as medical implants. Drug delivery systems, bone plates, screws, cranial, and dental devices are the popular examples of these implants - the potential alternatives for human life survival. However, the processing techniques of an engineered implant largely determine its preciseness, surface characteristics, and interactive ability with the adjacent tissue(s) in a particular biological environment. Moreover, the high cost-effective manufacturing of an implant under tight tolerances remains a challenge. In this regard, several subtractive or additive manufacturing techniques are employed to manufacture patient-specific implants, depending primarily on the required biocompatibility, bioactivity, surface integrity, and fatigue strength. The present paper reviews numerous non-degradable and degradable metallic implant biomaterials such as stainless steel (SS), titanium (Ti)-based, cobalt (Co)-based, nickel-titanium (NiTi), and magnesium (Mg)-based alloys, followed by their processing via traditional turning, drilling, and milling including the high-speed multi-axis CNC machining, and non-traditional abrasive water jet machining (AWJM), laser beam machining (LBM), ultrasonic machining (USM), and electric discharge machining (EDM) types of subtractive manufacturing techniques. However, the review further funnels down its primary focus on Mg, NiTi, and Ti-based alloys on the basis of the increasing trend of their implant applications in the last decade due to some of their outstanding properties. In the recent years, the incorporation of cryogenic coolant-assisted traditional subtraction of biomaterials has gained researchers’ attention due to its sustainability, environment-friendly nature, performance, and superior biocompatible and functional outcomes fitting for medical applications. However, some of the latest studies reported that the medical implant manufacturing requirements could be more remarkably met using the non-traditional subtractive manufacturing approaches. Altogether, cryogenic machining among the traditional routes and EDM among the non-traditional means along with their variants, were identified as some of the most effective subtractive manufacturing techniques for achieving the dimensionally accurate and biocompatible metallic medical implants with significantly modified surfaces.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Gupta, M. K., Sood, P. K., & Sharma, V. S. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.184 · Cited by 207
RetractedTi based biomaterials, the ultimate choice for orthopaedic implants – A review
Geetha, M., Singh, A. K., Asokamani, R., & Gogia, A. K. (2009) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.06.004 · Cited by 5,416
Self-citationState of the art electrical discharge machining (EDM)
Ho, K. H., & Newman, S. T. (2003) · International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture · doi:10.1016/s0890-6955(03)00162-7 · Cited by 1,729
A Review on Biomedical Titanium Alloys: Recent Progress and Prospect
Zhang, L., & Chen, L. (2019) · Advanced Engineering Materials · doi:10.1002/adem.201801215 · Cited by 1,100
Dubey, A. K., & Yadava, V. (2007) · International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture · doi:10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2007.10.017 · Cited by 888
Environmentally conscious machining of difficult-to-machine materials with regard to cutting fluids
Shokrani, A., Dhokia, V., & Newman, S. T. (2012) · International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture · doi:10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2012.02.002 · Cited by 859
Gittens, R. A., McLachlan, T., Olivares-Navarrete, R., Cai, Y., Berner, S., Tannenbaum, R., Schwartz, Z., Sandhage, K. H., & Boyan, B. D. (2011) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.029 · Cited by 827
Review of ultrasonic vibration-assisted machining in advanced materials
Yang, Z., Zhu, L., Zhang, G., Ni, C., & Lin, B. (2020) · International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture · doi:10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2020.103594 · Cited by 756
The aging of Wolff’s “law”: Ontogeny and responses to mechanical loading in cortical bone
Pearson, O. M., & Lieberman, D. E. (2004) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.20155 · Cited by 745
Biomedical Applications of Shape Memory Alloys
Petrini, L., & Migliavacca, F. (2011) · Journal of Metallurgy · doi:10.1155/2011/501483 · Cited by 585
Cited by
Bisphosphonate-incorporated coatings for orthopedic implants functionalization
Zhang, J., Bai, H., Bai, M., Wang, X., Li, Z., Xue, H., Wang, J., Cui, Y., Wang, H., Wang, Y., et al. (2023) · Materials Today Bio · doi:10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100737 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Davis, R., Singh, A., Jackson, M. J., Coelho, R. T., Prakash, D., Charalambous, C. P., Ahmed, W., da Silva, L. R. R., & Lawrence, A. A.
- Venue
- The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
- Published
- 2022-02-23
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 1473-1530
- ISSN
- 0268-3768 (ISSN-L)
- 1433-3015
- OpenAlex
- W4213452490
- Cited by
- 380
- References
- 104
- FWCI
- 19.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comprehensive review on metallic implant biomaterials and their subtractive manufacturing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00170-022-08770-8
- The paper
- Davis, R., Singh, A., Jackson, M. J., Coelho, R. T., Prakash, D., Charalambous, C. P., Ahmed, W., da Silva, L. R. R., & Lawrence, A. A. (2022). A comprehensive review on metallic implant biomaterials and their subtractive manufacturing. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-08770-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.