Cited by 42Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsUterine Myomas and TreatmentsSexual function and dysfunction studies

Family history and pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Samimi, Parisa, Jones, Sarah H., Giri, Ayush·2021·International Urogynecology Journal

Abstract

Numerous analytic observational studies assess family history as a risk factor for POP and report a wide range of associations. This review aims to systematically evaluate the role of family history of POP in relation to POP risk and its recurrence. A review was performed of the PubMed/MEDLINE database with search criteria specifying family history, risk factors, POP, and their synonyms as title/abstract keywords, as well as MESH terms, up to March 2020. We aggregated evidence across studies with fixed effects (FE) and random effects (RE) meta-analysis. Forty-three articles underwent full-text review. Eighteen independent studies evaluating the relationship between family history of POP and POP risk in 3639 POP cases and 10,912 controls were eligible for meta-analysis. Four studies evaluating family history and POP recurrence in 224 recurrent cases and 400 non-recurrent cases were eligible for inclusion into another meta-analyses. A positive family history of POP is on average associated with 2.3- to 2.7-fold increased risk for POP (RE OR = 2.64; 95% CI = 2.07, 3.35) as well as a 1.4-fold increased risk for POP recurrence (FE OR = 1.44; 95% CI = 1.00, 2.08). Meta-analysis estimates of POP risk varied by study design, definition of family history, and model adjustment status. We found evidence that publication bias and recall bias are a possibility. Family history of POP is a risk factor for both POP presence and recurrence. However, reported magnitudes may be overestimates due to confounding, recall bias, and publication bias.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00192-020-04559-z

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [36]Jelovsek JE, Chagin K, Gyhagen M, Hagen S, Wilson D, Kattan MW, Predicting risk of pelvic floor disorders 12 and 20 years after delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 218: 222.e1– 222.e19. 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.10.014. 29056536 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Samimi, P., Jones, S. H., & Giri, A.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Giri, Ayush
Venue
International Urogynecology Journal
Published
2020-10-21
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
759-774
ISSN
  • 0937-3462 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-3023
OpenAlex
W3093593118
Cited by
42
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4
FWCI
0.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Urogynecology Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women’s Health (2K12HD043483)
  • NIDDK (1K01DK120631-01A1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
Keywords
pelvic organ prolapse, family history (medicine), risk factors, prolapse recurrence, genetic risk, publication bias, recall bias, confounding
MeSH terms
Humans, Medical History Taking, Recurrence, Risk Factors, Pelvic Organ Prolapse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review