Cited by 260Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsUrinary Bladder and Prostate ResearchUterine Myomas and Treatments

The relationship between anterior and apical compartment support

Open access
Summers, Aimee, Winkel, Lisa A., Hussain, Hero K., DeLancey, John O.L.·2006·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract

Objective The purpose of this study was to determine whether the degree of anterior compartment (bladder) and apical compartment (cervix) prolapse are correlated, and whether 2 anterior compartment elements (urethra and bladder) are related at maximal Valsalva.Study design Women with a complete spectrum of pelvic support were recruited for a pelvic support study. Dynamic magnetic resonance scans were taken during Valsalva. A convenience sample of 153 women with a mean age of 53.3 +/- 12.5 (SD) years with a uterus in situ was studied. Anterior compartment status was assessed by the most caudal bladder point and the internal urinary meatus. The external cervical os was used to assess the apical compartment. The position of the bladder, urethra, and uterus were determined in 20 nulliparous women to determine their reference locations. The distances of each structure below the reference positions were calculated at maximum Valsalva.Results Average distances of the bladder base, urethra, and uterus from the reference positions at maximal Valsalva were 4.1 +/- 2.4 cm, 3.1 +/- 1.3 cm, and 4.3 +/- 2.4 cm, respectively. The Pearson correlation coefficient of the relationship between the bladder base and uterine distances was r = 0.73 (r2 = 0.53). The Pearson correlation coefficient of the bladder distance and urethral distance was r = 0.82 (r2 = 0.67).Conclusion Half of the observed variation in anterior compartment support may be explained by apical support.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.01.057

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Summers, A., Winkel, L. A., Hussain, H. K., & DeLancey, J. O. L.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
DeLancey, John O.L.
Venue
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-05
Volume
194
Issue
5
Pages
1438-1443
ISSN
0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2066560954
Cited by
260
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 20
FWCI
3.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD038665, P50HD044406, P50 HD 44406)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
Keywords
pelvic organ prolapse, cystocele, uterine descent, Valsalva maneuver, dynamic MRI, pelvic floor, nulliparous women
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Urinary Bladder, Cervix Uteri, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Middle Aged, Urethra, Uterine Prolapse, Valsalva Maneuver

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review