Cited by 43Thyroid Disorders and TreatmentsBone health and osteoporosis researchThyroid and Parathyroid Surgery

Relationship between subclinical thyroid dysfunction and the risk of fracture: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies

Yan, Z., Huang, H., Li, J., Wang, J.·2016·Osteoporosis International

Abstract

Unlabelled To identify the relationship between subclinical thyroid dysfunction and the risk of fracture, we conducted a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Results showed that subclinical hyperthyroidism is associated with an increased risk of fracture, especially in elder. Introduction There are conflicting data on the association between subclinical thyroid dysfunction and the risk of fracture. This study is aimed at providing a summary of prospective evidence of the relationship between subclinical thyroid dysfunction and the risk of fracture. Methods We systematically searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Chinese Biomedical literature database (CBM) from 1974 to August 2014 to identify prospective cohort studies which have studied the risk of fracture in patients with subclinical thyroid dysfunction. Various fractures were reported as the sole outcome. Results Five population-based cohort studies including 314,146 participants with relationship of endogenous or exogenous subclinical thyroid dysfunction or euthyroidism and fractures were identified as eligible for the meta-analysis. In an unadjusted model, the relative risk (RR) of subclinical hypothyroidism for fracture was 1.30 (CI 1.08-1.56). Risk estimates were lower in a multivariable-adjusted model (RR = 1.20, CI 0.70-2.04) and when higher quality studies (RR = 0.95, CI 0.58-1.57) were analyzed. For subclinical hyperthyroidism, the RR was 1.52 (CI 1.33-1.73) in unadjusted model and 1.25 (CI 1.11-1.41) in a…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00198-015-3221-z

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yan, Z., Huang, H., Li, J., & Wang, J.
Affiliations
Sichuan University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Huang, H.
  • Li, J.
Venue
Osteoporosis International
Published
2015-07-30
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
115-125
ISSN
  • 0937-941X (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-2965
OpenAlex
W1042835121
Cited by
43
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Osteoporosis International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery
Keywords
subclinical thyroid dysfunction, fracture risk, subclinical hyperthyroidism, subclinical hypothyroidism, older adults, bone fragility
MeSH terms
Hip Fractures, Humans, Hyperthyroidism, Hypothyroidism, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Thyroid Diseases, Fractures, Bone, Osteoporotic Fractures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review