Cited by 87Air Quality and Health ImpactsHeme Oxygenase-1 and Carbon MonoxideIndoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure

Comparative evaluation of the effects of short-term inhalation exposure to diesel engine exhaust on rat lung and brain

Open access
van Berlo, Damien, Albrecht, Catrin, Knaapen, Ad M., Cassee, Flemming R., Gerlofs-Nijland, Miriam E., Kooter, Ingeborg M., Palomero-Gallagher, Nicola, Bidmon, Hans-Jürgen +3 more·2010·Archives of Toxicology

Abstract

Combustion-derived nanoparticles, such as diesel engine exhaust particles, have been implicated in the adverse health effects of particulate air pollution. Recent studies suggest that inhaled nanoparticles may also reach and/or affect the brain. The aim of our study was to comparatively evaluate the effects of short-term diesel engine exhaust (DEE) inhalation exposure on rat brain and lung. After 4 or 18 h recovery from a 2 h nose-only exposure to DEE (1.9 mg/m(3)), the mRNA expressions of heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), and cytochrome P450 1A1 (CYP1A1) were investigated in lung as well as in pituitary gland, hypothalamus, olfactory bulb, olfactory tubercles, cerebral cortex, and cerebellum. HO-1 protein expression in brain was investigated by immunohistochemistry and ELISA. In the lung, 4 h post-exposure, CYP1A1 and iNOS mRNA levels were increased, while 18 h post-exposure HO-1 was increased. In the pituitary at 4 h post-exposure, both CYP1A1 and HO-1 were increased; HO-1 was also elevated in the olfactory tuberculum at this time point. At 18 h post-exposure, increased expression of HO-1 and COX-2 was observed in cerebral cortex and cerebellum, respectively. Induction of HO-1 protein was not observed after DEE exposure. Bronchoalveolar lavage analysis of inflammatory cell influx, TNF-alpha, and IL-6 indicated that the mRNA expression changes occurred in the absence of lung inflammation. Our study shows that a single, short-term inhalation exposure to DEE triggers region-specific gene expression changes in rat brain to an extent comparable to those observed in the lung.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00204-010-0551-7

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Melmed S The pituitary 2002 Cambridge Blackwell

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Berlo, D., Albrecht, C., Knaapen, A. M., Cassee, F. R., Gerlofs-Nijland, M. E., Kooter, I. M., Palomero-Gallagher, N., Bidmon, H.-J., van Schooten, F.-J., Krutmann, J., & Schins, R. P. F.
Affiliations
  • Leibniz Institute of Environmental Medicine (DE)
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (NL)
  • Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
Corresponding author
Schins, Roel P. F.
Venue
Archives of Toxicology
Published
2010-05-14
Volume
84
Issue
7
Pages
553-562
ISSN
  • 0340-5761 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0738
OpenAlex
W2017310881
Cited by
87
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 11
FWCI
6.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Archives of Toxicology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • JuSER (Forschungszentrum Jülich) (submittedVersion)
  • Rivm Repository (Netherlands National Institute for Public Health and the Environment) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • Ministry of Environment
  • Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Heme Oxygenase-1 and Carbon Monoxide
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
Keywords
diesel exhaust, particulate matter, inhalation exposure, heme oxygenase-1, inducible nitric oxide synthase, cyclooxygenase-2, CYP1A1, brain gene expression, lung gene expression, olfactory bulb, olfactory tubercle, pituitary gland, cerebral cortex, cerebellum, inflammatory cytokines, TNF-α, interleukin-6, recovery after exposure
MeSH terms
Animals, Vehicle Emissions, Brain, Lung, Male, Pneumonia, Rats, Inbred F344, Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha, Interleukin-6, Inhalation Exposure, Rats, Cyclooxygenase 2, Heme Oxygenase-1, Nitric Oxide Synthase Type II

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review