Commentary: Cumulative Risk Assessment of Perfluoroalkyl Carboxylic Acids and Perfluoralkyl Sulfonic Acids: What Is the Scientific Support for Deriving Tolerable Exposures by Assembling 27 PFAS into 1 Common Assessment Group?
Abstract
This commentary proposes an approach to risk assessment of mixtures of per- and polyfluorinated alkyl substances (PFAS) as EFSA was tasked to derive a tolerable intake for a group of 27 PFAS. The 27 PFAS to be considered contain different functional groups and have widely variable physicochemical (PC) properties and toxicokinetics and thus should not treated as one group based on regulatory guidance for risk assessment of mixtures. The proposed approach to grouping is to split the 27 PFAS into two groups, perfluoroalkyl carboxylates and perfluoroalkyl sulfonates, and apply a relative potency factor approach (as proposed by RIVM) to obtain two separate group TDIs based on liver toxicity in rodents since liver toxicity is a sensitive response of rodents to PFAS. Short chain PFAS and other PFAS structures should not be included in the groups due to their low potency and rapid elimination. This approach is in better agreement with scientific and regulatory guidance for mixture risk assessment.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Colnot and Dekant (2022) proposed a classification strategy for PFAS that divides them into two distinct groups: PFCA and PFSA; they concluded that PFAS with short chains or non-linear structures should not be included in either group because of their low toxicological potency and rapid elimination.
“To overcome the problems associated with estimating TEFs, Colnot and Dekant (2022) proposed a classification strategy for PFAS that divides them into two distinct groups: PFCA and PFSA. The authors concluded that PFAS with short chains or non-linear structures should not be included in either group because of their low toxicological potency and rapid elimination [51].”
From The EU’s Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Ban: A Case of Policy over Science (2023) · cites this paper as [51]
Cites
Buck, R. C., Franklin, J., Berger, U., Conder, J. M., Cousins, I. T., de Voogt, P., Jensen, A. A., Kannan, K., Mabury, S. A., & van Leeuwen, S. P. (2011) · Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management · doi:10.1002/ieam.258 · Cited by 4,641 · see citing works
Risk to human health related to the presence of perfluoroalkyl substances in food
Panel), E. P. O. C. I. T. F. C. (. C., Schrenk, D., Bignami, M., Bodin, L., Chipman, J. K., del Mazo, J., Grasl‐Kraupp, B., Hogstrand, C., Hoogenboom, L. (., Leblanc, J., et al. (2020) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6223 · Cited by 989 · see citing works
Barzen-Hanson, K. A., Roberts, S. C., Choyke, S., Oetjen, K., McAlees, A., Riddell, N., McCrindle, R., Ferguson, P. L., Higgins, C. P., & Field, J. A. (2017) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b05843 · Cited by 873 · see citing works
De Silva, A. O., Armitage, J. M., Bruton, T. A., Dassuncao, C., Heiger-Bernays, W., Hu, X. C., Kärrman, A., Kelly, B., Ng, C., Robuck, A., et al. (2020) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1002/etc.4935 · Cited by 835 · see citing works
More, S. J., Bampidis, V., Benford, D., Bennekou, S. H., Bragard, C., Halldorsson, T. I., Hernández, A. F., Koutsoumanis, K. P., Naegeli, H., Schlatter, J. R., et al. (2019) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5634 · Cited by 576 · see citing works
(CONTAM), E. P. O. C. I. T. F. C., Knutsen, H. K., Alexander, J., Barregård, L., Bignami, M., Brüschweiler, B. J., Ceccatelli, S., Cottrill, B., Dinovi, M., Edler, L., et al. (2018) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5194 · Cited by 519 · see citing works
Comparing the toxic potency in vivo of long-chain perfluoroalkyl acids and fluorinated alternatives
Gomis, M. I., Vestergren, R., Borg, D., & Cousins, I. T. (2018) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2018.01.011 · Cited by 438 · see citing works
Risk assessment of combined exposure to multiple chemicals: A WHO/IPCS framework
(2011) · Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2011.03.010 · Cited by 358 · see citing works
Meek, M. E., Boobis, A. R., Cote, I., Dellarco, V. L., Fotakis, G., Munn, S., Seed, J. G., & Vickers, C. (2013) · Journal of Applied Toxicology · doi:10.1002/jat.2949 · Cited by 287 · see citing works
Toxicological profile for perfluoroalkyls
(2018) · doi:10.15620/cdc:59198 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
Mechanistic Data and Risk Assessment of Selected Toxic End Points of the Thyroid Gland
Capen, C. C. (1997) · Toxicologic Pathology · doi:10.1177/019262339702500109 · Cited by 276 · see citing works
The Effect of Hepatic Enzyme-Inducing Drugs on Thyroid Hormones and the Thyroid Gland*
CURRAN, P. G., & DEGROOT, L. J. (1991) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/edrv-12-2-135 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
Pizzurro, D. M., Seeley, M., Kerper, L. E., & Beck, B. D. (2019) · Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.05.008 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Rosen, M. B., Lee, J. S., Ren, H., Vallanat, B., Liu, J., Waalkes, M. P., Abbott, B. D., Lau, C. S., & Corton, J. C. (2008) · Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfn025 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Fragki, S., Dirven, H. A. A. M., Fletcher, T., Grasl‐Kraupp, B., Gützkow, K. B., Hoogenboom, L. A. P., Kersten, S., Lindeman, B., Louisse, J., Peijnenburg, A., et al. (2021) · Critical Reviews in Toxicology · doi:10.1080/10408444.2021.1888073 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Jahnke, A., & Berger, U. (2009) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2008.08.098 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Risk Assessment of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substance Mixtures: A Relative Potency Factor Approach
Bil, W., Zeilmaker, M., Fragki, S., Lijzen, J., Verbruggen, E., & Bokkers, B. (2020) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1002/etc.4835 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
(PPR), E. P. O. P. P. P. A. T. R. (2013) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3293 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Gene Profiling in the Livers of Wild-type and PPARα-Null Mice Exposed to Perfluorooctanoic Acid
Rosen, M. B., Abbott, B. D., Wolf, D. C., Corton, J. C., Wood, C. R., Schmid, J. E., Das, K. P., ZEHR, R. D. J., Blair, E. T., & Lau, C. S. (2008) · Toxicologic Pathology · doi:10.1177/0192623308318208 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Read-across approaches - misconceptions, promises and challenges ahead
Patlewicz, G. Y. (2014) · ALTEX · doi:10.14573/altex.1410071 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Goodrum, P. E., Anderson, J. K., Luz, A. L., & Ansell, G. K. (2021) · Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfaa123 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
More, S. J., Bampidis, V., Benford, D., Bragard, C., Hernández, A. F., Bennekou, S. H., Halldorsson, T. I., Koutsoumanis, K. P., Lambré, C., Machera, K. A., et al. (2021) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2021.7033 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Neoplastic Lesions of Questionable Significance to Humans
Alison, R., Capen, C. C., & Prentice, D. E. (1994) · Toxicologic Pathology · doi:10.1177/019262339402200211 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Zhang, L., Ren, X., Wan, B., & Guo, L. (2014) · Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.taap.2014.06.020 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Patlewicz, G. Y., & Fitzpatrick, J. M. (2015) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrestox.5b00388 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Deciding which chemical mixtures risk assessment methods work best for what mixtures☆
Teuschler, L. K. (2006) · Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.taap.2006.07.010 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Simon, J. A., Abrams, S., Bradburne, T., Bryant, J. D., Burns, M., Cassidy, D. P., Cherry, J. A., Chiang, S. D., Cox, D., Crimi, M. L., et al. (2019) · Remediation Journal · doi:10.1002/rem.21624 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Chou, W.-C., & Lin, Z. (2019) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2019.03.058 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Dellarco, V. L., McGregor, D. B., Berry, S. C., Cohen, S. M., & Boobis, A. R. (2006) · Critical Reviews in Toxicology · doi:10.1080/10408440600975242 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Chou, W., & Lin, Z. (2020) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2020.105581 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Foster, J. R., Tinwell, H., & Melching‐Kollmuss, S. (2021) · Archives of Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s00204-020-02961-6 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Lampic, A., & Parnis, J. M. (2020) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1002/etc.4681 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Antoniou, E. E., Colnot, T., Zeegers, M. P., & Dekant, W. (2022) · Archives of Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s00204-022-03303-4 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Self-citationWhy Toxic Equivalency Factors Are Not Suitable for Perfluoroalkyl Chemicals
Peters, J. M., & Gonzalez, F. J. (2011) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/tx200316x · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Hovey, R. C., Coder, P. S., Wolf, J. C., Sielken, R. L., Tisdel, M. O., & Breckenridge, C. B. (2010) · Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfq337 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Poly- and perfluorinated compounds activate human pregnane X receptor
Zhang, Y., Dong, X., Fan, L., Zhang, Z., Wang, Q., Jiang, N., & Yang, X. (2017) · Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.tox.2017.01.012 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
An approach for mixture testing and prioritization based on common kinetic groups
Braeuning, A., Bloch, D., Karaca, M., et al. (2022) · Archives of Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s00204-022-03264-8 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
The Cumulative Risk Assessment of Hepatotoxic Chemicals: A Hepatic Histopathology Perspective
Foster, J. R., Beninel, G. S., & Melching‐Kollmuss, S. (2020) · Toxicologic Pathology · doi:10.1177/0192623319895481 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
A flow scheme for cumulative assessment of pesticides for adverse liver effects
Colnot, T., Melching‐Kollmuss, S., Semino, G. A., et al. (2020) · Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104694 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationThe 3M Company (2020) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4025325 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The EU’s Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Ban: A Case of Policy over Science
Spyrakis, F., & Dragani, T. A. (2023) · Toxics · doi:10.3390/toxics11090721 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
- Authors
- Colnot, T., & Dekant, W.
- Affiliations
- University of Würzburg (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Dekant, Wolfgang
- ORCID
- Dekant, Wolfgang
- Venue
- Archives of Toxicology
- Published
- 2022-08-17
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3127-3139
- ISSN
- 0340-5761 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0738
- OpenAlex
- W4292291335
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Archives of Toxicology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- 3M
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural safety and regulations
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
- Keywords
- per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, PFAS mixtures, cumulative risk assessment, tolerable daily intake, chemical grouping, perfluorinated carboxylic acids, perfluoroalkyl sulfonic acids, relative potency factors, hepatotoxicity, toxicokinetics, EFSA
- MeSH terms
- Carboxylic Acids, Fluorocarbons, Sulfonic Acids, Alkanesulfonic Acids, Risk Assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review