Cited by 86Advanced Drug Delivery SystemsCholinesterase and Neurodegenerative DiseasesNanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of nasal liposome and nanoparticle based rivastigmine formulations in acute and chronic models of Alzheimer’s disease

Open access
Rompicherla, Sampath Kumar L., Arumugam, Karthik, Bojja, Sree Lalitha, Kumar, Nitesh, Rao, C. Mallikarjuna·2021·Naunyn-Schmiedeberg s Archives of Pharmacology

Abstract

With the increasing aging population and progressive nature of the disease, Alzheimer's disease (AD) poses to be an oncoming epidemic with limited therapeutic strategies. It is characterized by memory loss, behavioral instability, impaired cognitive function, predominantly, cognitive inability manifested due to the accumulation of β-amyloid, with malfunctioned cholinergic system. Rivastigmine, a reversible dual cholinesterase inhibitor, is a more tolerable and widely used choice of drug for AD. However, rivastigmine being hydrophilic and undergoing the first-pass metabolism exhibits low CNS bioavailability. Nanoformulations including liposomes and PLGA nanoparticles can encapsulate hydrophilic drugs and deliver them efficiently to the brain. Besides, the nasal route is receiving considerable attention recently, due to its direct access to the brain. Therefore, the present study attempts to evaluate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of nasal liposomal and PLGA nanoparticle formulations of rivastigmine in acute scopolamine-induced amnesia and chronic colchicine induced cognitive dysfunction animal models, and validate the best formulation by employing pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) modeling. Nasal liposomal rivastigmine formulation showed the best pharmacokinetic features with rapid onset of action (Tmax = 5 min), higher Cmax (1489.5 ± 620.71), enhanced systemic bioavailability (F = 118.65 ± 23.54; AUC = 35,921.75 ± 9559.46), increased half-life (30.92 ± 8.38 min), and reduced clearance rate (Kel (1/min) = 0.0224 ± 0.006) compared to oral rivastigmine (Tmax = 15 min; Cmax = 56.29 ± 27.05; F = 4.39 ± 1.82; AUC = 1663.79 ± 813.54; t1/2 = 13.48 ± 5.79; Kel (1/min) = 0.0514 ± 0.023). Further, the liposomal formulation significantly rescued the memory deficit induced by scopolamine as well as colchicine superior to other formulations as assessed in Morris water maze and passive avoidance tasks. PK-PD modeling demonstrated a strong correlation between the pharmacokinetic parameters and acetylcholinesterase inhibition of liposomal formulation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00210-021-02096-0

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Compared to oral pills, transdermal patches are more pleasant and provide a smaller dosage, leading to fewer side effects.

    “Compared to oral pills, transdermal patches are more pleasant and provide a smaller dosage, which leads to fewer side effects.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rompicherla, S. K. L., Arumugam, K., Bojja, S. L., Kumar, N., & Rao, C. M.
Affiliations
Manipal Academy of Higher Education (IN)
Corresponding author
Rao, C. Mallikarjuna
Venue
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg s Archives of Pharmacology
Published
2021-06-04
Volume
394
Issue
8
Pages
1737-1755
ISSN
  • 0028-1298 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1912
OpenAlex
W3130760084
Cited by
86
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 2
FWCI
5.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Naunyn-Schmiedeberg s Archives of Pharmacology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
Keywords
rivastigmine, Alzheimer's disease, intranasal drug delivery, liposomes, PLGA nanoparticles, nanocarrier formulation, scopolamine-induced amnesia, pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling, cholinesterase inhibitors, memory impairment, Morris water maze, passive avoidance, first-pass metabolism, drug repurposing, amyloid-beta
MeSH terms
Rivastigmine, Administration, Intranasal, Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Biological Availability, Cholinesterase Inhibitors, Colchicine, Disease Models, Animal, Liposomes, Male, Memory Disorders, Models, Biological, Scopolamine, Rats, Wistar, Maze Learning, Area Under Curve, Rats, Nanoparticles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review