Cannabinoid CB1 receptor-mediated impairment of visuospatial attention in the rat
Abstract
Rationale CB1 receptors (CB1Rs) mediate many of the psychoactive effects of cannabinoids, and marijuana intoxication can produce neurocognitive deficits with a similarity to those seen in schizophrenia, including impairments of attention. Objectives We thus sought to characterize the effects of a CB1R-selective agonist and antagonist on attention in the rat using a lateralized reaction time task (LRT). We hypothesized that CB1R agonists would impair performance and that CB1R antagonists might improve performance. Methods Subjects were trained to perform the LRT, a procedure that measured their ability to attend to and detect brief visual target stimuli. After training, we tested the effects of the CB1R agonist WIN55,212-2 (WIN; 0-2.5 mg/kg) or the CB1R antagonist SR141716A (SR; 0-1.0 mg/kg), administered alone or in combination, on visual attention performance using task conditions in which target stimulus salience was varied systematically across trials. Results The highest dose of WIN reduced correct choices in well-trained rats, with impairment greatest at the shortest stimulus durations. The highest dose of WIN also increased omissions and slowed response times. By contrast, SR itself did not produce any measurable effects on performance but was able to prevent the impairment produced by WIN. Conclusions These results suggest that CB1Rs mediate the attentional performance impairments caused by acute administration of cannabinoid agonists and begin to unravel the possible contribution of cannabinoid systems to the pathophysiological substrates of cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In adult rodents, acute administration of alcohol, nicotine, or marijuana alters aspects of learning and memory associated with the FC and HC.
“In adult rodents, acute administration of alcohol, nicotine, or marijuana alters aspects of learning and memory associated with the FC and HC (Hahn et al. 2002; Gould 2003; Arguello and Jentsch 2004; Pamplona and Takahashi 2006; Semenova et al. 2007; Portugal et al. 2012), indicating that mechanisms responsible for learning and memory are sensitive to those substances.”
From The long-term cognitive consequences of adolescent exposure to recreational drugs of abuse (2018) · cites this paper as Arguello and Jentsch 2004
Cites
Herkenham, M., Lynn, A., Johnson, M., Melvin, L., de Costa, B., & Rice, K. (1991) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.11-02-00563.1991 · Cited by 2,159 · see citing works
The endogenous cannabinoid system controls extinction of aversive memories
Marsicano, G., Wotjak, C. T., Azad, S. C., Bisogno, T., Rammes, G., Cascio, M. G., Hermann, H., Tang, J., Hofmann, C., Zieglgänsberger, W., et al. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature00839 · Cited by 1,728 · see citing works
Localization of cannabinoid receptor mRNA in rat brain
Matsuda, L. A., Bonner, T. I., & Lolait, S. J. (1993) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.903270406 · Cited by 631 · see citing works
Leweke, F. M., Schneider, U., Thies, M., Münte, T. F., & Emrich, H. M. (1999) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s002130050884 · Cited by 102 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Specifically, cannabinoids have been shown to affect perception, working memory, visual attention and sensorimotor gating in a manner that bears strong similarity to the psychopathology of schizophrenia (Jentsch et al. 1997; Leweke et al. 1999b; Macavoy and Marks 1975; Mallet and Beninger 1998; Schneider and Koch 2002…”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The long-term cognitive consequences of adolescent exposure to recreational drugs of abuse
Mooney-Leber, S. M., & Gould, T. J. (2018) · Learning & Memory · doi:10.1101/lm.046672.117 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
“…administration of alcohol, nicotine, ormarijuana alters aspects of learning andmemory associatedwith the FC and HC (Hahn et al. 2002; Gould 2003; Arguello and Jentsch 2004; Pamplona and Takahashi 2006; Semenova et al. 2007; Portugal et al. 2012), indicating that mechanisms responsible for…”
BackgroundNicotine and cannabinoids: parallels, contrasts and interactions
VIVEROS, M., MARCO, E., & FILE, S. (2006) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.08.002 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
- Authors
- Arguello, P. A., & Jentsch, J. D.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jentsch, J. David
- Venue
- Psychopharmacology
- Published
- 2004-07-29
- Volume
- 177
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 141-150
- ISSN
- 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-2072
- OpenAlex
- W2027085365
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Keywords
- CB1 receptor, cannabinoid receptor agonists, WIN 55,212-2, SR141716A, visuospatial attention, attentional impairment, target salience, marijuana intoxication, schizophrenia, cognitive impairment, cannabinoid receptor antagonists
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Attention, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Male, Morpholines, Naphthalenes, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Rats, Long-Evans, Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1, Benzoxazines, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review