Cited by 102Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchVisual perception and processing mechanismsHallucinations in medical conditions

Effects of synthetic Δ 9 -tetrahydrocannabinol on binocular depth inversion of natural and artificial objects in man

Leweke, F. M., Schneider, U., Thies, Martin, Münte, Thomas F., Emrich, Hinderk M.·1999·Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Binocular depth inversion represents an illusion of visual perception that is sensitive to various behavioural and psychiatric conditions. It is affected by cannabinoids, reflecting associated changes in perception. The present study investigated the differences in binocular depth inversion of different classes of natural and artificial objects and the effect of synthetic delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Dronabinol) on these illusionary perceptions. Using this model, the effects of orally administered Dronabinol on binocular depth inversion were investigated in 17 healthy male volunteers. Pictures from natural and artificial objects were presented stereoscopically and the depth perception of the volunteers was scored in an operationalized way. The timecourse of the effects of Dronabinol on binocular depth inversion was analyzed with regard to the stimulus classes (natural and synthetic objects). Significant differences in binocular depth inversion of the different groups of stimuli were revealed. Objects with a higher degree of everyday familiarity were generally seen as more illusionary than those with a lower degree of everyday familiarity. A strong impairment of binocular depth inversion due to Dronabinol was found in most classes of objects. Analysis of different stimulus classes provides further information on the underlying perceptual processing of binocular depth inversion. An impairment of top-down processing of visual sensory data by Dronabinol is suggested. The anandamidergic system seems to be involved in areas of visual information processing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s002130050884

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Induction of pro-psychotic states in non-clinical populations via acute cannabinoids, chronic intoxication, or sleep deprivation experimentally reduces sensitivity to visual illusions.

    “other studies have suggested that the induction of “pro-psychotic” states in non-clinical populations, via, for example, acute cannabinoids (Emrich et al., 1997; Leweke et al., 1999; Koethe et al., 2006), chronic intoxication (Semple et al., 2003) or sleep deprivation (Sternemann et al., 1997), enable to experimentally reduce sensitivity to VIs.”

    From What visual illusions teach us about schizophrenia (2014) · cites this paper as Leweke et al., 1999

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leweke, F. M., Schneider, U., Thies, M., Münte, T. F., & Emrich, H. M.
Affiliations
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE)
Venue
Psychopharmacology
Published
1999-03-04
Volume
142
Issue
3
Pages
230-235
ISSN
  • 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2072
OpenAlex
W1972994864
Cited by
102
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
Keywords
delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, dronabinol, optical illusions, object familiarity, stereoscopic depth perception
MeSH terms
Adult, Electrophysiology, Hallucinogens, Humans, Illusions, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychology, Perception, Dronabinol, Vision, Binocular, Observation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review