Cited by 91Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study

Medication screening for smoking cessation: A proposal for new methodologies

Perkins, Kenneth A., Stitzer, Maxine, Lerman, Caryn·2006·Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Rationale The purpose of medication screening studies is to quickly and cheaply evaluate the clinical potential of medications, so that promising drugs proceed to large-scale clinical trials and unpromising drugs do not. Screening procedures for smoking cessation medications either are not sufficiently practical or lack clinical validity. Clinical trials have clinical validity but are often impractical as initial tests of efficacy (i.e., screening) or suffer from limited statistical power. The alternative approach of short-term, laboratory-based studies of purported mechanisms of efficacy may overcome some of the practical problems of clinical trials but appear to have limited clinical validity.Objectives This commentary identifies some of the limitations of current short-term screening procedures and provides suggestions for improving such studies.Results Short-term screening studies typically use smokers unmotivated to abstain (i.e., nontreatment seekers) as participants and examine brief medication effects on clinical markers or potential mechanisms of action, including relief of withdrawal and craving during enforced abstinence or on reduction in the reinforcing effects of smoked tobacco. The limitation of these approaches is shown by their insensitivity to effects of nicotine replacement and bupropion, which are effective in clinical trials for smoking cessation.Conclusions The clinical validity of short-term screening studies may improve if these studies simulate some clinical trial procedures within practical limitations. Thus, they should recruit smokers motivated to abstain, emphasize smoking abstinence as a primary index of medication response, examine effects over sufficiently long time periods to encompass the drug's mechanism of action, and assess responses in the natural environment. Whether these changes improve the sensitivity of screening studies is testable. Other research aimed specifically at identifying the mechanisms of therapeutic action of a medication may also profit from using this approach of simulating a short-term clinical trial.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00213-005-0105-5

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The within-subject crossover design and enrollment of treatment-seeking smokers provides a more sensitive test of medication effects.

    “The within-subject cross-over design and enrollment of treatment-seeking smokers provides a more sensitive test of medication effects (19).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Perkins, K. A., Stitzer, M., & Lerman, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Abramson Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Perkins, Kenneth A.
Venue
Psychopharmacology
Published
2005-09-15
Volume
184
Issue
3-4
Pages
628-636
ISSN
  • 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2072
OpenAlex
W2128149876
Cited by
91
References
64
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA017555, P50DA84718, DA017555, DA16483, R01DA016483)
  • National Cancer Institute (P50CA084718)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
Keywords
smoking cessation, drug screening, nicotine replacement therapy, bupropion, clinical validity, nicotine withdrawal, craving, abstinence, mechanism of action
MeSH terms
Smoking Prevention, Administration, Cutaneous, Administration, Oral, Clinical Trials as Topic, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Humans, Motivation, Nicotine, Smoking, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Smoking Cessation, Bupropion, Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review