Cited by 27Smoking Behavior and CessationStress Responses and CortisolSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Effect of social stress during acute nicotine abstinence

Open access
Wardle, Margaret C., Munafò, Marcus R., de Wit, Harriet·2011·Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Rationale Relapse to smoking is often precipitated by stress, yet little is known about the effects of nicotine withdrawal on responses to acute stress, or whether nicotine replacement reverses withdrawal-induced changes in stress response.Objectives The aim of the present study is to use an effective social stressor, the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST), to study subjective, cardiovascular and hormonal responses to stress during withdrawal, and examine whether nicotine replacement moderates responses to stress during withdrawal.Methods Forty-nine current regular smokers were randomly assigned to smoke as normal (SM), 12-h abstention with placebo patch (PL), or 12-h abstention with nicotine patch (NIC). They participated in a single session using the TSST, during which subjective affect, heart rate (HR), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and salivary cortisol were measured.Results The TSST produced expected increases in subjective negative affect, HR, MAP, and cortisol. Groups did not differ in subjective or cardiovascular responses, but the PL group exhibited larger stress-induced increase in cortisol than the other groups.Conclusions The increased cortisol response might indicate a greater hormonal stress response during nicotine withdrawal. Alternatively, considering that cortisol also provides negative feedback to the stress system, and blunted cortisol responses are predictive of smoking relapse, the lower cortisol responses in the NIC and SM groups might indicate chronic dysregulation of the stress system. In this case, restoration of cortisol response by nicotine treatment to the lower levels seen during regular smoking may actually represent an undesired side effect of nicotine replacement.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00213-010-2150-y

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Consuming high sugar beverages, smoking, and alcohol intake can dampen the physiological stress response in the short run, but are clearly damaging to health if maintained over the lifespan.

    “For example, consuming high sugar beverages (Tryon et al., 2015), smoking (Wardle et al., 2011) and alcohol intake (Stephens and Wand, 2012) can dampen the physiological stress response in the short run, but are clearly damaging to health if maintained over the lifespan.”

    From More than a feeling: A unified view of stress measurement for population science (2018) · cites this paper as Wardle et al., 2011

    The Results (Hormonal; page unavailable) report a larger stress-induced cortisol increase in abstinent smokers given placebo than in smokers who continued smoking, supporting a short-term difference in hormonal stress response. The paper found no group difference in cardiovascular stress responses, and it does not establish the citing sentence’s claim about health damage over the lifespan. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wardle, M. C., Munafò, M. R., & de Wit, H.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Venue
Psychopharmacology
Published
2011-01-15
Volume
218
Issue
1
Pages
39-48
ISSN
  • 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2072
OpenAlex
W2028738774
Cited by
27
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Economic and Social Research Council (ES/G007489/1)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA002812)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
nicotine withdrawal, social stress, Trier Social Stress Test, nicotine replacement therapy, nicotine patch, cortisol response, heart rate, blood pressure, smoking relapse, stress response, negative affect
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Blood Pressure, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Male, Psychological Tests, Recurrence, Saliva, Smoking, Stress, Psychological, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Tobacco Use Disorder, Smoking Cessation, Young Adult, Tobacco Use Cessation Devices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review