Cited by 38Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsCognitive Functions and Memory

Psychoactive drugs and false memory: comparison of dextroamphetamine and delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol on false recognition

Open access
Ballard, Michael E., Gallo, David A., de Wit, Harriet·2012·Psychopharmacology

Abstract

RATIONALE: Several psychoactive drugs are known to influence episodic memory. However, these drugs' effects on false memory, or the tendency to incorrectly remember nonstudied information, remain poorly understood. OBJECTIVES: Here, we examined the effects of two commonly used psychoactive drugs, one with memory-enhancing properties (dextroamphetamine; AMP), and another with memory-impairing properties (Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol; THC), on false memory using the Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) illusion. METHODS: Two parallel studies were conducted in which healthy volunteers received either AMP (0, 10, and 20 mg) or THC (0, 7.5, and 15 mg) in within-subjects, randomized, double-blind designs. Participants studied DRM word lists under the influence of the drugs, and their recognition memory for the studied words was tested 2 days later, under sober conditions. RESULTS: As expected, AMP increased memory of studied words relative to placebo, and THC reduced memory of studied words. Although neither drug significantly affected false memory relative to placebo, AMP increased false memory relative to THC. Across participants, both drugs' effects on true memory were positively correlated with their effects on false memory. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that AMP and THC have opposing effects on true memory, and these effects appear to correspond to similar, albeit more subtle, effects on false memory. These findings are consistent with previous research using the DRM illusion and provide further evidence that psychoactive drugs can affect the encoding processes that ultimately result in the creation of false memories.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00213-011-2374-5

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cannabis-intoxicated eyewitnesses and suspects are common.

    “cannabis-intoxicated eyewitnesses and suspects are common (4)”

    From Hazy memories in the courtroom: A review of alcohol and other drug effects on false memory and suggestibility (2021) · cites this paper as [4]

    The Introduction describes THC use as widespread and says its effects on false memory may have social implications. It does not address how often eyewitnesses or suspects are cannabis-intoxicated; searches for eyewitnesses, suspects, and forensic contexts found no such passage. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ballard, M. E., Gallo, D. A., & de Wit, H.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Venue
Psychopharmacology
Published
2011-06-07
Volume
219
Issue
1
Pages
15-24
ISSN
  • 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2072
OpenAlex
W2006912344
Cited by
38
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA 02812, R01DA002812, T32DA007255)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
false memory, d-amphetamine, delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, recognition memory, episodic memory, memory-enhancing drugs, memory impairment, individual differences in memory
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Dextroamphetamine, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Psychomotor Performance, Psychotropic Drugs, Dronabinol, Recognition, Psychology, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review