Cited by 1,003Treatment of Major DepressionNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorAnimal testing and alternatives

Forced swimming test in mice: A review of antidepressant activity

Petit-Demouliere, Benoit, Chenu, Franck, Bourin, Michel·2005·Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Rationale Among all animal models, the forced swimming test (FST) remains one of the most used tools for screening antidepressants.Objective This paper reviews some of the main aspects of the FST in mice. Most of the sensitivity and variability factors that were assessed on the FST are summarized.Mechanisms We have summarized data found in the literature of antidepressant effects on the FST in mice. From this data set, we have extrapolated information on baseline levels of strain, and sensitivity against antidepressants.Results We have shown that many parameters have to be considered in this test to gain good reliability. Moreover, there was a fundamental inter-strain difference of response in the FST.Conclusions The FST is a good screening tool with good reliability and predictive validity. Strain is one of the most important parameters to consider. Swiss and NMRI mice can be used to discriminate the mechanisms of action of drugs. CD-1 seems to be the most useful strain for screening purposes, but this needs to be confirmed with some spontaneous locomotor activity studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00213-004-2048-7

Cites

103 of 103 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Immobility in the forced-swim test is a passive coping strategy and is often used as an indicator of a depression-like state in rodents.

    “Immobility in the forced-swim test represents a passive coping strategy in the face of challenge and is often used to indicate a depression-like state in rodent models (Petit-Demouliere et al., 2005).”

    From Anatomically defined and functionally distinct dorsal raphe serotonin sub-systems (2018) · cites this paper as Petit-Demouliere et al., 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Petit-Demouliere, B., Chenu, F., & Bourin, M.
Affiliations
Nantes Université (FR)
Corresponding author
Bourin, Michel
Venue
Psychopharmacology
Published
2004-11-18
Volume
177
Issue
3
Pages
245-255
ISSN
  • 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2072
OpenAlex
W1996166611
Cited by
1,003
References
103
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 65 · 2015: 65 · 2014: 69 · 2013: 55 · 2012: 51
FWCI
1.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
Keywords
forced swim test, antidepressant screening, mouse strains, interstrain differences, test sensitivity, test variability, predictive validity, ICR mice, Swiss mice, NMRI mice, locomotor activity
MeSH terms
Animals, Antidepressive Agents, Behavior, Animal, Humans, Psychopharmacology, Swimming, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review