Cited by 97Sleep and Work-Related FatigueCoffee research and impactsSleep and Wakefulness Research

Caffeine improves reaction time, vigilance and logical reasoning during extended periods with restricted opportunities for sleep

Open access
Kamimori, Gary H., McLellan, Tom M., Tate, Charmaine M., Voss, David M., Niro, Phil, Lieberman, Harris R.·2015·Psychopharmacology

Abstract

RATIONALE: Various occupational groups are required to maintain optimal physical and cognitive function during overnight periods of wakefulness, often with less than optimal sleep. Strategies are required to help mitigate the impairments in cognitive function to help sustain workplace safety and productivity. OBJECTIVES: To test the effectiveness of repeated 200 mg doses of caffeine on cognitive function and live-fire marksmanship with soldiers during three successive nights of sustained wakefulness followed by 4-h afternoon sleep periods. METHODS: Twenty Special Forces personnel (28.6 ± 4.7 years, 177.6 ± 7.5 cm and 81.2 ± 8.0 kg) were randomly assigned to receive four 200-mg doses of caffeine (n = 10) or placebo (n = 10) during the late evening and early morning hours during three successive days. An afternoon 4-h sleep period followed. The psychomotor (PVT) and field (FVT) vigilance, logical reasoning (LRT) tests and a vigilance monitor assessed cognitive function throughout the study. Live-fire marksmanship requiring friend-foe discrimination was assessed. RESULTS: Caffeine maintained speed on the PVT (p < 0.02), improved detection of events during FVT (p < 0.001), increased number of correct responses to stimuli as assessed by the vigilance monitor (p < 0.001) and increased response speed during the LRT (p < 0.001) throughout the three overnight testing periods. Live-fire marksmanship was not altered by caffeine. CONCLUSIONS: A total daily dose of 800 mg caffeine during successive overnight periods of wakefulness is an effective strategy to maintain cognitive function when optimal sleep periods during the day are not available.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00213-014-3834-5

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Caffeine improves psychomotor vigilance, such as reaction time.

    “Finally, caffeine improves psychomotor vigilance, such as reaction time (71–73).”

    From The Safety of Ingested Caffeine: A Comprehensive Review (2017) · cites this paper as [71]

  • The impact of caffeine on performance appears to be greater under conditions that would negatively impact performance, such as acute caffeine withdrawal or sleep deprivation.

    “The impact of caffeine appears to be greater under conditions that would negatively impact performance, such as acute caffeine withdrawal (74–76) or sleep deprivation (71, 77).”

    From The Safety of Ingested Caffeine: A Comprehensive Review (2017) · cites this paper as [71]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kamimori, G. H., McLellan, T. M., Tate, C. M., Voss, D. M., Niro, P., & Lieberman, H. R.
Affiliations
  • Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (US)
  • Defence Research and Development Canada (CA)
  • New Zealand Defence Force (NZ)
  • U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
McLellan, Tom M.
Venue
Psychopharmacology
Published
2014-12-21
Volume
232
Issue
12
Pages
2031-2042
ISSN
  • 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2072
OpenAlex
W2134167564
Cited by
97
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
5.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Defense
  • U.S. Department of Energy
  • Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education
  • Medical Research and Materiel Command
  • U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Keywords
caffeine, cognitive function, sustained attention, reaction time, logical reasoning, sustained wakefulness, sleep deprivation, military personnel, special forces, psychomotor vigilance, event detection, occupational safety
MeSH terms
Adult, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Arousal, Attention, Caffeine, Cognition, Humans, Male, Military Personnel, Motor Activity, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Sleep, Wakefulness, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review