Cited by 101Coffee research and impactsSleep and Work-Related FatigueCircadian rhythm and melatonin

The influences of age and caffeine on psychomotor and cognitive function

Rees, Katy, Allen, D., Lader, Malcolm·1999·Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Rationale The response to caffeine is affected by a number of factors, including age. Older subjects may be more sensitive to the objective effects than younger but report fewer subjective effects.Objective This study assessed the influence of age on the effects of caffeine on a variety of psychomotor, cognitive and subjective tests.Methods Forty-eight healthy subjects, male and female, were recruited, 24 in the age range 20-25 and 24 in the range 50-65 years. All subjects were regular moderate caffeine drinkers and were not withdrawn from caffeine before entry to the study. A double-blind parallel group design was used with two groups of 12 subjects in each age range. One group in each age range received placebo and the other 250 mg caffeine B.P. A range of tests was used to assess psychomotor, cognitive and subjective functioning before and 1 h post-treatment.Results Before treatment, young subjects generally performed better than older on psychomotor and cognitive tests. On the subjective tests, however, older subjects rated themselves as more alert and less tired than the younger ones. After placebo, performance and alertness improved in the younger group but declined in the older. After caffeine there were improvements in psychomotor performance and cognitive functioning in both groups, particularly in offsetting declining performance over time in the older subjects. It also produced subjective improvements in alertness. One factor to emerge was that on most assessments older subjects were better earlier in the day whereas in younger subjects performance did not show the same magnitude of decline throughout the day.Conclusions Caffeine induced small but significant improvements in vigilance and psychomotor performance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s002130051047

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rees, K., Allen, D., & Lader, M.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Venue
Psychopharmacology
Published
1999-07-23
Volume
145
Issue
2
Pages
181-188
ISSN
  • 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2072
OpenAlex
W2012330442
Cited by
101
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
1.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
Keywords
caffeine, age differences, psychomotor performance, cognitive function, sustained attention, alertness, subjective effects, older adults, age-related decline, time of day effects
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Age Factors, Aged, Caffeine, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Middle Aged, Psychomotor Performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review