The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Regulations relating to mycotoxins in food: Perspectives in a global and European context
Open accessAbstract
Regulations relating to mycotoxins have been established in many countries to protect the consumer from the harmful effects of these compounds. Different factors play a role in the decision-making process of setting limits for mycotoxins. These include scientific factors, for example the availability of toxicological data and occurrence data, detailed knowledge about possibilities for sampling and analysis, and socio-economic issues. By the end of 2003, approximately 100 countries (covering approximately 85% of the world's inhabitants) had specific regulations or detailed guidelines for mycotoxins in food. The regulations were related to aflatoxins (B(1), B(2), G(1) and G(2)), aflatoxin M(1), trichothecenes (deoxynivalenol, diacetoxyscirpenol, T-2 toxin and HT-2 toxin), fumonisins (B(1), B(2), and B(3)), agaric acid, ergot alkaloids, ochratoxin A, patulin, phomopsins, sterigmatocystin, and zearalenone. In Europe, and in particular in the EU, regulatory and scientific interest in mycotoxins has undergone a development in the last decade from autonomous national activity towards more EU-driven activity with a structural and network character. Harmonized EU limits now exist for 40 mycotoxin-food combinations. It is expected this number will grow in 2007 to approximately 50. The direct or indirect influence of European organizations and programs on the EU mycotoxin regulatory developments is significant. They include the European Food Safety Authority, the Scientific Cooperation on Questions relating to Food, the Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed, the creation of an EU Community Reference Laboratory for Mycotoxins and a mandate of the EC to the European Standardization Committee in methods for analysis for mycotoxins in food. Large pan-European research and networking projects as "BioCop" and "MoniQA" are also important.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Impact of food processing and detoxification treatments on mycotoxin contamination
Karlovsky, P., Suman, M., Berthiller, F., De Meester, J., Eisenbrand, G., Perrin, I., Oswald, I. P., Speijers, G., Chiodini, A., Recker, T., et al. (2016) · Mycotoxin Research · doi:10.1007/s12550-016-0257-7 · Cited by 689
Worldwide aflatoxin contamination of agricultural products and foods: From occurrence to control
Jallow, A., Xie, H., Tang, X., Qi, Z., & Li, P. (2021) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/1541-4337.12734 · Cited by 363
Antifungal Microbial Agents for Food Biopreservation—A Review
Leyva Salas, M., Mounier, J., Valence, F., Coton, M., Thierry, A., & Coton, E. (2017) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms5030037 · Cited by 349
Hua, S. S. T., Beck, J. J., Sarreal, S. B. L., & Gee, W. (2014) · Mycotoxin Research · doi:10.1007/s12550-014-0189-z · Cited by 181
The impacts of aflatoxin standards on health and nutrition in sub-Saharan Africa: The case of Kenya
Sirma, A. J., Lindahl, J. F., Makita, K., Senerwa, D., Mtimet, N., Kang’ethe, E. K., & Grace, D. (2018) · Global Food Security · doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2018.08.001 · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- van Egmond, H. P., Schothorst, R. C., & Jonker, M. A.
- Venue
- Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
- Published
- 2007-05-17
- Volume
- 389
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 147-157
- ISSN
- 1618-2642 (ISSN-L)
- 1618-2650
- OpenAlex
- W1544971129
- Cited by
- 738
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 28.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Regulations relating to mycotoxins in food: Perspectives in a global and European context. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00216-007-1317-9
- The paper
- van Egmond, H. P., Schothorst, R. C., & Jonker, M. A. (2007). Regulations relating to mycotoxins in food: Perspectives in a global and European context. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-007-1317-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.