Cited by 192Coffee research and impactsFood Chemistry and Fat AnalysisPotato Plant Research

Formation of aliphatic acids by carbohydrate degradation during roasting of coffee

Ginz, Michael, Balzer, Hartmut H., Bradbury, A. G. W., Maier, Hans G.·2000·European Food Research and Technology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s002170000215

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ginz, M., Balzer, H. H., Bradbury, A. G. W., & Maier, H. G.
Affiliations
Technische Universität Braunschweig (DE)
Venue
European Food Research and Technology
Published
2000-11-03
Volume
211
Issue
6
Pages
404-410
ISSN
  • 0373-0174 (ISSN-L)
  • 1438-2377
  • 1438-2385
OpenAlex
W2016400047
Cited by
191
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 9
FWCI
1.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
European Food Research and Technology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Chemistry and Fat Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Potato Plant Research
Keywords
coffee roasting, aliphatic acids, formic acid, acetic acid, glycolic acid, lactic acid, carbohydrate degradation, sucrose, glucose, fructose, green coffee beans, isotopic labeling, thermal degradation, acid production

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review