The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Are functional deficits in concussed individuals consistent with white matter structural alterations: combined FMRI & DTI study
Open accessAbstract
There is still controversy in the literature whether a single episode of mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) results in short-term functional and/or structural deficits as well as any induced long-term residual effects. With the inability of traditional structural brain imaging techniques to accurately diagnosis MTBI, there is hope that more advanced applications like functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) will be more specific in diagnosing MTBI. In this study, 15 subjects who have recently suffered from sport-related MTBI and 15 age-matched normal controls underwent both fMRI and DTI to investigate the possibility of traumatic axonal injury associated with functional deficits in recently concussed but asymptomatic individuals. There are several findings of interest. First, MTBI subjects had a more disperse brain activation pattern with additional increases in activity outside of the shared regions of interest (ROIs) as revealed by FMRI blood oxygen level–dependent (BOLD) signals. The MTBI group had additional activation in the left dorsal-lateral prefrontal cortex during encoding phase of spatial navigation working memory task that was not observed in normal controls. Second, neither whole-brain analysis nor ROI analysis showed significant alteration of white matter (WM) integrity in MTBI subjects as evidenced by fractional anisotropy FA (DTI) data. It should be noted, however, there was a larger variability of fractional anisotropy (FA) in the genu, and body of the corpus callosum in MTB subjects. Moreover, we observed decreased diffusivity as evidenced by apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) at both left and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DL-PFC) in MTBI subjects (P < 0.001). There was also a positive correlation (P < 0.05) between ADC and % change of fMRI BOLD signals at DL-PFC in MTBI subjects, but not in normal controls. Despite these differences we conclude that overall, no consistent findings across advanced brain imaging techniques (fMRI and DTI) were observed. Whether the lack of consistency across research techniques (fMRI & DTI) is due to time frame of scanning, unique nature of MTBI and/or technological issues involved in FA and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) quantification is yet to be determined.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL
Smith, S. M., Jenkinson, M., Woolrich, M. W., Beckmann, C. F., Behrens, T. E. J., Johansen-Berg, H., Bannister, P. R., De Luca, M., Drobnjak, I., Flitney, D. E., et al. (2004) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051 · Cited by 13,630
Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast mr images
Rueckert, D., Sonoda, L. I., Hayes, C., Hill, D. L. G., Leach, M. O., & Hawkes, D. J. (1999) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/42.796284 · Cited by 5,265
Diffusion tensor imaging of acute mild traumatic brain injury in adolescents
Wilde, E. A., McCauley, S. R., Hunter, J. V., Bigler, E. D., Chu, Z., Wang, Z. J., Hanten, G. R., Troyanskaya, M., Yallampalli, R., Li, X., et al. (2008) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000305961.68029.54 · Cited by 525
Bazarian, J. J., Zhong, J., Blyth, B., Zhu, T., Kavcic, V., & Peterson, D. (2007) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.2007.0241 · Cited by 487
Cited by
Diffusion tensor imaging studies of mild traumatic brain injury: a meta-analysis
Aoki, Y., Inokuchi, R., Gunshin, M., Yahagi, N., & Suwa, H. (2012) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp-2012-302742 · Cited by 237
Churchill, N. W., Caverzasi, E., Graham, S. J., Hutchison, M. G., & Schweizer, T. A. (2017) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23658 · Cited by 104
Bennett, R. E., & Brody, D. L. (2014) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.2013.3320 · Cited by 64
Long-term working memory deficits after concussion: electrophysiological evidence
Ozen, L. J., Itier, R. J., Preston, F. F., & Fernandes, M. A. (2013) · Brain Injury · doi:10.3109/02699052.2013.804207 · Cited by 64
Mayer, A. R., Ling, J. M., Dodd, A. B., Meier, T. B., Hanlon, F. M., & Klimaj, S. D. (2017) · Brain Imaging and Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11682-016-9546-1 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, K., Johnson, B., Pennell, D., Ray, W., Sebastianelli, W., & Slobounov, S.
- Venue
- Experimental Brain Research
- Published
- 2010-05-23
- Volume
- 204
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 57-70
- ISSN
- 0014-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1106
- OpenAlex
- W1973123465
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 12.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.