Cited by 57Bone health and osteoporosis researchMenopause: Health Impacts and TreatmentsHormonal and reproductive studies

Circulating Sex Steroids, Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin, and Longitudinal Changes in Forearm Bone Mineral Density in Postmenopausal Women and Men: The Tromsø Study

Bjørnerem, Åshild, Emaus, Nina, Berntsen, Gro K. R., Joakimsen, Ragnar M., Fønnebø, Vinjar, Wilsgaard, Tom, Øian, Pål, Seeman, Ego +1 more·2007·Calcified Tissue International

Abstract

Bone loss during advancing age in women and men is partly the result of sex steroid deficiency. As the contribution of circulating sex steroids and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) to bone loss remains uncertain, we sought to determine whether levels of sex steroids or SHBG predict change in bone mineral density (BMD) in women and men. A population-based study in the city of Tromsø of 6.5 years' duration (range 5.4-7.4) included 927 postmenopausal women aged 37-80 years and 894 men aged 25-80 years. Total estradiol and testosterone, calculated free levels, and SHBG were measured at baseline, and BMD change at the distal forearm was determined using BMD measurements in 1994-1995 and 2001. Bone loss was detected in postmenopausal women and men. Free estradiol and SHBG predicted age-adjusted bone loss in postmenopausal women, but only free estradiol was associated after further adjustment for body mass index and smoking in mixed models (P < 0.05). After same adjustment, only SHBG persisted as a significant independent predictor of bone loss in men (P < 0.001). However, only 1% of the variance in bone loss was accounted for by these measurements. We therefore conclude that the relations between sex steroids and bone loss are weak and measurements of sex steroids are unlikely to assist in clinical decision making.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00223-007-9035-z

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bjørnerem, Å., Emaus, N., Berntsen, G. K. R., Joakimsen, R. M., Fønnebø, V., Wilsgaard, T., Øian, P., Seeman, E., & Straume, B.
Affiliations
  • UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO)
  • University Hospital of North Norway (NO)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Bjørnerem, Åshild
Venue
Calcified Tissue International
Published
2007-07-06
Volume
81
Issue
2
Pages
65-72
ISSN
  • 0171-967X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0827
OpenAlex
W1972798208
Cited by
57
References
8
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Calcified Tissue International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • EkstraStiftelsen Helse og Rehabilitering (Stiftelsen Dam)
  • Norges Forskningsråd
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal and reproductive studies
Keywords
sex steroids, sex hormone-binding globulin, bone mineral density, bone loss, postmenopausal women, men, free estradiol, free testosterone, forearm, aging, sex hormone deficiency
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Bone and Bones, Estradiol, Female, Forearm, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Norway, Osteoporosis, Radiography, Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin, Gonadal Steroid Hormones, Testosterone, Time Factors, Cohort Studies, Bone Density, Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review