The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A recent shift from polygyny to monogamy in humans is suggested by the analysis of worldwide Y-chromosome diversity.
Abstract
Molecular genetic data contain information on the history of populations. Evidence of prehistoric demographic expansions has been detected in the mitochondrial diversity of most human populations and in a Y-chromosome STR analysis, but not in a previous study of 11 Y-chromosome SNPs in Europeans. In this paper, we show that mismatch distributions and tests of mutation/drift equilibrium based on up to 166 Y-chromosome SNPs, in 46 samples from all continents, also fail to support an increase of the male effective population size. Computer simulations show that the low nuclear versus mitochondrial mutation rates cannot explain these results. However, ascertainment bias, i.e., when only highly variable SNP sites are typed, may be concealing any Y SNPs evidence for a recent, but not an ancient, increase in male effective population sizes. The results of our SNP analyses can be reconciled with the expansion of male effective population sizes inferred from STR loci, and with mitochondrial evidence, by admitting that humans were essentially polygynous during much of their history. As a consequence, until recently only a few men may have contributed a large fraction of the Y-chromosome pool at every generation. The number of breeding males may have increased, and the variance of their reproductive success may have decreased, through a recent shift from polygyny to monogamy, which is supported by ethnological data and possibly accompanied the shift from mobile to sedentary communities.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A handful of studies have also shown a reduced effective number of men compared to that of women, based on coalescent methods [23],[24], but none have considered the influence of social organization on this dissimilarity”
From Sex-Specific Genetic Structure and Social Organization in Central Asia: Insights from a Multi-Locus Study (2008) · cites this paper as [23]
Citations
Cited by
Fenner, J. N. (2005) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.20188 · Cited by 508
Sex differences in cooperation: A meta-analytic review of social dilemmas.
Balliet, D., Li, N. P., Macfarlan, S. J., & Van Vugt, M. (2011) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0025354 · Cited by 349
The effect of the Neolithic expansion on European molecular diversity
Currat, M., & Excoffier, L. (2005) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.2999 · Cited by 210
Ségurel, L., Martínez-Cruz, B., Quintana-Murci, L., Balaresque, P., Georges, M., Hegay, T., Aldashev, A., Nasyrova, F., Jobling, M. A., Heyer, E., et al. (2008) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000200 · Cited by 95
Nelson, E., Rolian, C., Cashmore, L., & Shultz, S. (2011) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.1740 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Dupanloup, I., Pereira, L., Bertorelle, G., Calafell, F., Prata, M. J., Amorim, A., & Barbujani, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Molecular Evolution
- Published
- 2003-07-01
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 85-97
- ISSN
- 0022-2844
- 1432-1432
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 0
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review