Cited by 489Marine Invertebrate Physiology and EcologyInvertebrate Taxonomy and EcologyProtist diversity and phylogeny

The New View of Animal Phylogeny

Halanych, Kenneth M.·2004·Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics

Abstract

▪ Abstract Molecular tools have profoundly rearranged our understanding of metazoan phylogeny. Initially based on the nuclear small ribosomal subunit (SSU or 18S) gene, recent hypotheses have been corroborated by several sources of data (including the nuclear large ribosomal subunit, Hox genes, mitochondrial gene order, concatenated mitochondrial genes, and the myosin II heavy chain gene). Herein, the evidence supporting our current understanding is discussed on a clade by clade basis. Bilaterian animals consist of three clades: Deuterostomia, Lophotrochozoa, and Ecdysozoa. Each clade is supported by molecular and morphological data. Deuterostomia is smaller than traditionally recognized, consisting of hemichordates, echinoderms, chordates, and Xenoturbella (an enigmatic worm-like animal). Lophotrochozoa groups animals with a lophophore feeding apparatus (Brachiopoda, Bryozoa, and Phoronida) and trochophore larvae (e.g., annelids and mollusk), as well as several other recognized phyla (e.g., platyhelmin thes, sipunculans, nemerteans). Ecdysozoa comprises molting animals (e.g., arthropods, nematodes, tardigrades, priapulids), grouping together two major model organisms (Drosophila and Caenorhabditis) in the same lineage. Platyhelminthes do not appear to be monophyletic, with Acoelomorpha holding a basal position in Bilateria. Before the emergence of bilateral animals, sponges, ctenophorans, cnidarians, and placozoans split from the main animal lineage, but order of divergence is less than certain. Many questions persist concerning relationships within Ecdysozoa and Lophotrochozoa, poriferan monophyly, and the placement of many less-studied taxa (e.g., kinorhynchs, gastrotrichs, gnathostomulids, and entoprocts).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.112202.130124

Cites

203 of 203 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Protoconodonts have been interpreted as grasping spines of the Chaetognatha, a protostomian phylum close to the Lophotrochozoa, but most likely its sister-group.

    “These have been interpreted as grasping spines of the Chaetognatha, a protostomian phylum close to the Lophotrochozoa, but most likely its sister-group (Halanych, 2004; Dunn et al . 2008).”

    From Chronology of early Cambrian biomineralization (2012) · cites this paper as Halanych, 2004

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 204 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Halanych, K. M.
Affiliations
Auburn University (US)
Corresponding author
Halanych, Kenneth M.
Venue
Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics
Published
2004-12-15
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
229-256
ISSN
  • 1543-592X (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2069
OpenAlex
W2114395497
Cited by
489
References
204
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 22
FWCI
6.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protist diversity and phylogeny
Keywords
animal phylogeny, metazoan phylogeny, deuterostomes, Lophotrochozoa, Ecdysozoa, Acoelomorpha, Cnidaria, placozoans, Hox genes, mitochondrial gene order, myosin II heavy chain, Xenoturbella, hemichordates, Echinodermata, Chordata

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review