Cited by 364Congenital Heart Disease StudiesCardiovascular Conditions and TreatmentsFetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders

Autoregulation of Cerebral Blood Flow in Fetuses with Congenital Heart Disease: The Brain Sparing Effect

Donofrio, M. T., Bremer, Y. A., Schieken, R. M., Gennings, C., Morton, L. D., Eidem, B. W., Cetta, F., Falkensammer, C. B. +2 more·2003·Pediatric Cardiology

Abstract

Fetuses with congenital heart disease (CHD) have circulatory abnormalities that may compromise cerebral oxygen delivery. We believe that some CHD fetuses with decreased cerebral oxygen supply have autoregulation of blood flow that enhances cerebral perfusion (brain sparing). We hypothesize that cerebral autoregulation occurs in CHD fetuses, and the degree of autoregulation is dependent on the specific CHD and correlates with intrauterine head circumferences. CHD fetuses were compared to normal fetuses. Data included cardiac diagnosis, cerebral and umbilical artery Doppler, head circumference, weight, and gestational age. The cerebral-to-placental resistance ratio (CPR) was assessed as a measure of cerebral autoregulation. CPR = cerebral/umbilical resistance index (RI) and RI = systolic-diastolic/systolic velocity (normal CPR > 1). CPR > 1 was found in 95% of normal vs 44% of CHD fetuses. The incidence of CPR < 1 was greatest in hypoplastic left or right heart fetuses. Compared to normal, cerebral RI was decreased in CHD fetuses. The CPR vs gestational age relationship, and the relationship among weight, head circumference, and CPR differed across normal and CHD fetuses. Fetuses > 2 kg with CHD and a CPR < 1 had smaller head circumferences than normal. Brain sparing occurs in CHD fetuses. Fetuses with single ventricular physiology are most affected. Inadequate cerebral flow in CHD fetuses, despite autoregulation, may alter brain growth.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00246-002-0404-0

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Donofrio, M. T., Bremer, Y. A., Schieken, R. M., Gennings, C., Morton, L. D., Eidem, B. W., Cetta, F., Falkensammer, C. B., Huhta, J. C., & Kleinman, C. S.
Affiliations
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
  • Loyola University Medical Center (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Donofrio, M. T.
Venue
Pediatric Cardiology
Published
2003-09-01
Volume
24
Issue
5
Pages
436-443
ISSN
  • 0172-0643 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1971
OpenAlex
W1977425029
Cited by
364
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 9
FWCI
6.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pediatric Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiovascular Conditions and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
Keywords
cerebral autoregulation, congenital heart disease, brain sparing effect, cerebral blood flow, cerebral oxygen delivery, umbilical artery resistance index, fetal head circumference, fetal brain development, single ventricle, hypoplastic left heart syndrome, hypoplastic right heart syndrome, fetal hemodynamics
MeSH terms
Blood Flow Velocity, Cerebral Arteries, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Echocardiography, Fetus, Gestational Age, Head, Heart Diseases, Humans, Prospective Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review